The Time Is Right for a ‘Great Books’ Revival
To build a better world in the age of AI, students need grounding in indispensable ideas.
In 1970, poet June Jordan questioned the lack of central courses teaching heritage of heroes and heroines, rebellion, and loving accomplishment during a middle-school graduation speech in Brooklyn. As a literature professor at MIT, the author is working to develop a Great Books program inspired by Jordan's vision and includes the history, poetics, and philosophy of science.
During a summer of conversations with experts from various fields, essential themes emerged: invention, the interplay between examined life and self-creation.
These experts include Homer, Hansberry, Virgil, Whitman, Dickinson, Dewey, Melville, Morrison, Douglass, and Du Bois. The program aims to ground students in a humanistic research program while providing accessible, dynamic conversations to all.
In a time of rapid technological advancements, it's crucial to address declining literacy rates, potential job loss, and the impact of artificial intelligence on society. The author argues that timeless works of literature can help prepare individuals for this new world by fostering patience, astonishment, and attention to detail.
The concept of a core curriculum has evolved over time, with early discussions emphasizing intellectual culture and the interplay between disciplines. Today, there remains no consensus on what a core curriculum should entail. The author cites examples from Yale, St. John's College, Columbia University, and others, showcasing the ongoing debate.
Ultimately, the author believes that a renewed emphasis on the arts and humanities, along with a clearer understanding of the importance of scientific knowledge, is necessary to navigate the complexities of the modern world. Literature, the author suggests, offers invaluable lessons in courage, imagination, and freedom, making it a crucial element in education during this transformative period.
Written by urgent.news from The Atlantic's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.