An open letter to the Chief Justice of Ghana
My Lord, respectfully, I write to you as a humble citizen who believes that public leadership requires courage, consistency and a commitment to truth.
Respected Chief Justice, I am writing to you as a concerned citizen. I have observed the recent discussions surrounding your statements on governance and the state of our institutions. I have also noted the allegations of biased opinions and demands for your departure from office. My intention is to convey a straightforward message: do not be disheartened.
The people of Ghana value your unwavering consistency and your commitment to stating facts as you perceive them. The truth, though occasionally painful, uncomfortable, or politically inconvenient, must be communicated. Holding public office should not compel an individual to disregard their moral compass or civic duty. As the Chief Justice of Ghana, you are first and foremost a citizen of this nation.
You contribute to society through taxation and reside within our borders. You are directly impacted by the outcomes of economic policies and governance decisions. It is only natural for you to be invested in the advancement, development, and wellbeing of the Ghanaian people. While your position entails legal and moral duties, notably maintaining judicial independence, this should not equate to remaining silent on matters of national significance.
It is intriguing that in our democratic framework, the President can express opinions on Judiciary-related issues, the Legislature, the economy, education, security, and various other facets of national life; the Speaker of Parliament can comment on matters concerning the Executive and Judiciary; Members of Parliament and other political figures regularly critique the actions of every governmental branch.
However, whenever you, as the Chief Justice, address the state of our country, many immediately question your role. Why should the Chief Justice refrain from expressing opinions about Ghana beyond court rulings and administrative responsibilities? The response should not be that you should refrain from voicing your views simply because of your highest judicial office.
If your assertions are inaccurate, those who disagree should present the correct information. If your statistics are erroneous, provide the accurate figures. If a statement breaches a specific constitutional or ethical guideline, point out the rule and demonstrate the violation. However, the propagandists cannot merely label you as partisan simply because you express viewpoints they oppose.
Not everyone is infallible. You cannot satisfy everyone. If your comments align with their interests, you will receive praise. If you express something they find disagreeable, they will assail you. They are not divine beings. Therefore, remain authentic to yourself. Continue to contemplate Ghana. Persist in caring about the well-being of Ghanaians.
Persist in observing developments beyond the courtroom. Continue to engage in the national discourse, within the limits of the Constitution and your ethical obligations. I firmly believe that Ghana requires leaders who are willing to speak truth to power, irrespective of which political party holds authority. Chief Justice, continue to contemplate Ghana.
Continue to articulate Ghana's needs. Continue to serve Ghana. The truth, though potentially bitter, is what Ghana deserves.
Written by urgent.news from MyJoyOnline Ghana's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.