Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

RBA’s Hunter sees limited AI productivity gains so far

RBA’s Hunter sees limited AI productivity gains so far

A Reserve Bank of Australia official cautioned on Monday that artificial intelligence has not yet demonstrated clear productivity gains or caused significant job losses, while warning that it could pose financial stability risks. Assistant Governor Sarah Hunter spoke at a UBS conference in Sydney, noting that AI's impact on inflation will likely evolve over time.

She explained that the technology is currently driving up demand and contributing to price pressures while the economy grapples with supply constraints. Evidence remains limited that AI has materially boosted productivity or substantially influenced employment levels, according to Hunter. However, there are preliminary signs of adjustment, such as reduced job postings and employment outcomes in AI-exposed occupations, alongside stronger growth in sectors less impacted by the technology, particularly for younger workers.

The official cautioned that AI could heighten financial stability risks, as asset prices may experience sharp repricing if returns from AI investments fall short of expectations. Hunter stated that supply will eventually align with demand as data center capacity and related sectors expand, alleviating current bottlenecks. If AI ultimately delivers broader productivity gains, economies will be better positioned to produce more with the same inputs, and the initial inflationary pressures from AI investment are likely to fade away.

The article was AI-generated with editorial review and published as part of a broader discussion on economic conditions, including the Reserve Bank of Australia's recent interest rate hikes aimed at curbing inflation.

Written by urgent.news from Investing.com's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 2 other outlets

Read the original at investing.com →

More in AI

Reviewing AI-generated code at volume: the ceilings per forge

AI code review usually gets evaluated on quality and then deployed into a volume problem. The reviewer that looked sharp on a five-file pull request meets a backlog where an agent opens twelve a day…

  • Forge API quota limits AI reviewer's activity, causing apparent outages
  • Vendor quota appears as reviewers going quiet, with differing metering systems
  • Azure DevOps provides transparent throughput units (TSTU) for consumption monitoring

The Three Guard Rails Every AI Code Review Rollout Needs

Your bot just sent you an invoice for its own learning curve. Pull up a chair, grab a cup of chai, and listen to this quote.

  • Implement strict instructions for AI review, treating files as formal orders for junior reviewers
  • Roll out AI review system gradually, starting small, monitoring productivity and costs
  • Track signal effectiveness with metrics: genuine issues caught vs. noise comments generated

ChatGPT is about to get a number that shows how often it talks about your business: GEO is getting data from model owners.

By Nokka | November 9, 2026 This article was written by AI (deepseek-v4.1-flash · Model provider: ollama-cloud) via Hermes Agent under human control and quality review - Nokka.

  • OpenAI developing tools to track business performance in ChatGPT.
  • Tools will monitor mentions and clicks of businesses within conversations.
  • Data will update daily and be presented in graphical format.

More from Monday 9 November →