Lawyer Seeks New Appeal Framework for LPDC Decisions

Emmanuel Umohinyang, a legal practitioner, has urged the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), the Attorney-General of the Federation and the Body of Benchers to create a legally sound appeal process for addressing decisions made by the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC). Writing separate letters to the three entities, Umohinyang warned that the lack of a defined appeal system could jeopardize the rights of lawyers facing disciplinary actions.

He expressed concerns about transparency and public trust in the regulation of the legal profession. This call came after the Supreme Court ruled that Section 12(7) of the Legal Practitioners Act, which gave the Apex Court the authority to hear direct appeals against LPDC decisions, was unconstitutional. This ruling has sparked questions about the correct judicial route for lawyers dissatisfied with disciplinary penalties seeking redress.

Umohinyang also cited a recent decision by the Federal High Court, which upheld Joe-Kyari Gadzama's three-year suspension by the LPDC. He urged the NBA to form a dedicated committee to investigate the issue, collaborate with relevant bodies and the National Assembly to find a suitable legislative solution. According to Umohinyang, a transparent appeal framework would safeguard the rights of legal professionals and complainants, while ensuring the LPDC remains effective.

He emphasized that professional accountability should be balanced with fair hearings and access to justice, and that uncertainty surrounding appeals could undermine confidence in the disciplinary system.