Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

What do coding interviews miss about real-world Applied AI and Forward Deployed Engineering?

A lot of engineering interview preparation focuses on solving a well-defined problem with clearly specified inputs and outputs. But customer-facing engineering rarely starts that way. Imagine receiving a client request like: “We have thousands of support tickets. Can you use AI to identify the important ones and route them to the right teams?” Before writing code, I’d want to understand: What…

Engineering interview preparation often revolves around solving well-defined problems with clearly specified inputs and outputs. However, this is at odds with the reality of customer-facing engineering. Consider a client request such as, "We have thousands of support tickets. Can you use AI to identify the important ones and route them to the right teams?"

Before diving into coding, one would need to comprehend what determines a ticket's importance, the consequences of the system's mistakes, how success can be measured when labels are incomplete, the optimal points for human intervention when an automated decision is required, and strategies for detecting problems post-deployment.

The true essence of engineering work often lies in unearthing the requirements, devising evaluation methods, and determining the boundaries of automation.

Drawing from experiences in applied AI, solutions engineering, or forward-deployed roles, what skills prove to be the most challenging to evaluate through standard coding exercises? Which practical deployment or customer-integration challenges would make for an effective real-world exercise? If you have prepared for these roles, what aspects of existing resources seemed to fall short?

Please refrain from disclosing any confidential interview questions or employer-specific information. This inquiry is an academic exploration, with no intent to sell or promote any educational product.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in AI

Ghost in the Machine: Breathing Open-Source Life into My AI Agent

👻 Ghost in the Machine: Breathing Open-Source Life into My AI Agent What happens when an AI agent becomes more than just lines of code?

  • Ghost in the Machine concept brings AI beyond simple dialogue
  • Open-source project's success relies on architectural decisions and engineering practices
  • Author advocates open-source collaboration for accessible AI technology

My AI agent's mood is three numbers and a 16-emotion table. Here's the math

PaulusAI has a persistent mood, and it's not a vibe prompt. It's a PAD vector (Pleasure, Arousal, Dominance), each in [-1, 1].

  • Emotions like joy, pride, and gratification influence the mood vector based on their PAD signatures.
  • The system decays the mood vector by 15% towards a personality baseline of +0.04 for pleasure.

More from Sunday 1 November →