Former U.S. ambassadors: America must stand with Ukraine
Current U.S. policy raises the fundamental question of whether Washington understand what is at stake.
Former U.S. ambassadors have called upon America to stand firm with Ukraine, emphasizing that treating the survival of a democracy under attack as a bargaining chip is not a credible defense of freedom worldwide. Russia's war against Ukraine is not merely a territorial dispute, but a test of whether democratic nations will defend their principles or allow an authoritarian aggressor to destroy them through military force, terror, and economic coercion.
The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova over alleged war crimes. Ukraine's defense is not charity, but a strategic investment in American and European security, the credibility of U.S. commitments, and the deterrence of future conflicts. While diplomacy is essential and peace talks should be pursued, peace cannot mean rewarding aggression or allowing Russia the time to rearm.
Economic pressure is crucial, as Russia's military campaign depends on energy revenues and international markets. The U.S. needs to enforce restrictions consistently and impose consequences for those aiding Russia's war effort. Historical U.S. presidents have demonstrated that combining military strength, alliances, diplomacy, and a commitment to the independence of free nations strengthens America's security.
A policy that pressures Ukraine more than Russia or offers economic relief without substantial concessions risks rewarding aggression. Ukraine's future should not be decided over the heads of Ukrainians, but by a democratic world bound by common principles.
Written by urgent.news from Politico EU's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
