Landowners win Rs 1.22 crore relief against builder
In a recent case in the Maharashtra Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, landowners Sejal Pravin Shah and Monal H Mehta successfully won a relief of Rs 1.22 crore against a builder. The dispute began in March 2010, when the landowners transferred their rights to a builder for redevelopment purposes. The developer, however, allegedly failed to fulfill financial and statutory obligations, refusing to pay the agreed compensation, delayed possession fee, and other costs.
The agreement stipulated that the builder was to provide a 1,395 sq. ft. flat, parking, and monetary benefits, but the landowners did not receive their share of the stamp duty, registration charges, enhanced compensation for the increased Floor Space Index (FSI), or the rent and penalties for delayed possession. Instead, the developer demanded a baseless legal notice from the landowners, which further infuriated them.
The Consumer Commission found that the developer had blatantly disregarded the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 by not registering the Agreement to Offer Permanent Alternate Accommodation. They also failed to pay the financial entitlements owed to the landowners, which the Commission deemed to be an unfair trade practice.
The court ordered the developer to execute and register the agreement within 60 days, pay the stamp duty and registration charges, provide Rs 88 lakh for enhanced FSI compensation, Rs 6,60,000 for rent arrears, Rs 16,50,000 for delayed possession penalty, and Rs 10,00,000 for raw material reimbursement. Additionally, the developer must pay Rs 1,00,000 for mental agony and Rs 50,000 for litigation costs.
The landowners' success was due to the clear record of their entitlements in the executed agreements and the developer's breach of clearly recorded contractual obligations. The registration of the permanent alternate accommodation agreement is essential as it formally records the landowner's rights in the replacement flat, including area, possession entitlement, and developer's other obligations.
Written by urgent.news from The Economic Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
