HOWEVER BAD THINGS GET, MAY THE MILITARY NEVER RETURN!

It is crucial to acknowledge that just because current circumstances are challenging, it does not automatically imply that military rule would be a preferable alternative, cautions GODWIN SOGOLO. In times of adversity, it is natural and reasonable to seek solace in the understanding that things could have been even more dire. However, this perspective should not lead us to accept the status quo simply because it represents a less horrifying alternative.

While it is true that military governments possess certain advantages, such as discipline and decisiveness, these qualities do not necessarily equate to effective governance in complex and diverse societies. Civilian institutions, despite their flaws, have been developed through a long process of refinement and adaptation to the unique needs and values of African nations.

They are not simply copied from Western models but are tailored to the African context, taking into account cultural, historical, and socio-political realities.

Moreover, the argument that military intervention is justified merely because civilian governments have failed is weak and flawed. It is akin to saying that because a doctor failed to save a patient's life, a surgeon should be given a chance to perform surgery. The doctor may have failed, but it does not mean that surgery is the best or only solution. Similarly, the fact that civilian governments have fallen short does not justify military rule, which carries its own set of risks and challenges.

Instead of resorting to the fear of a worse alternative, we should strive to find ways to strengthen and reform our existing democratic institutions, making them more responsive, accountable, and reflective of the diverse African social fabric. This approach respects the cultural and historical nuances of Africa while working towards a governance system that truly serves the needs and aspirations of its people.