Comparing AI video models side by side: what I learned planning one prompt through Veo, Kling and Seedance
Disclosure: I work on Vidlark. All prices and specs below are copied from the public model pages as of October 2026. When people compare AI video models, they usually post three clips and a gut reaction. That is fun, but it skips the part that decides what you actually ship: what each model accepts, how long the clip can be, whether sound comes with it, and what one attempt costs. So I took a…
In this investigative piece, a reporter explores the nuances of three AI video models—Veo, Kling, and Seedance—by guiding a single prompt through each of them. The test prompt is a specific scene involving a cyclist riding through a rainy neon street at night, with reflections on wet asphalt and accompanying sound effects.
Veo, deemed the cheapest option, generates a 8-second clip in either 720p or 1080p resolution, with sound integrated into the picture. The report highlights the importance of sound quality in the model's output, suggesting that the inclusion of a sound line in the prompt significantly enhances the final result. It also notes that busy scenes may benefit more from Fast and Quality settings.
Kling 3.0, on the other hand, is tailored towards capturing physical motion and adhering to camera directions. The model suggests starting with a low tracking shot or a slow dolly in before the subject enters the frame. The report advises reordering the prompt to lead with camera language and recommends blocking the shot without sound first, only adding audio when necessary.
Seedance 2.0 stands out as a multi-shot model, capable of generating several cuts from a single prompt while maintaining consistency in people and props across the clips. The model supports various resolutions and sound, and the report emphasizes the importance of numbering the shots and maintaining the same light source throughout to create a cohesive sequence.
Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
