Employers are buying AI tools. Their managers are being left behind
Thirty-seven per cent. Eleven per cent. Those two numbers, tucked deep inside Jobstreet by SEEK’s Singapore Workplace Culture Study 2026, may say more about the region’s productivity problem than any headline about AI or inflation. The first is the share of employees who try to manage workplace pressure by quietly drawing their own boundaries: muting […] The post Employers are buying AI tools.…
The survey conducted by Jobstreet by SEEK in Singapore reveals a significant gap in how employers view their employees' work habits compared to what employees actually do. Thirty-seven percent of employees try to manage workplace pressure by setting boundaries, while only eleven percent feel comfortable discussing these pressures with their managers.
Employers prioritize proactive problem-solving, but only thirty-two percent of employees consider it a top expectation. Meanwhile, seventy-three percent of employees rely on rapid replies and after-hours availability, behaviors that only thirty-nine percent and eighteen percent of employers, respectively, expect. The study shows that the mismatch exists mainly due to the absence of a proper performance metric in hybrid work environments.
Employees resort to visible actions like replying to messages at odd hours, while invisible actions like solving complex problems go unnoticed. Line managers play a crucial role in this feedback loop, as both employees and employers blame them for the unwritten expectation of constant availability. Younger employees aged 25 to 34 face the most pressure, with 64 percent experiencing it frequently, mostly self-imposed.
The pressure is often higher for early-career workers, who experience it more than older employees. However, this pressure does not lead to career progression, with 62 percent of employees believing it has no impact on their advancement. Employers argue they have tools to manage workplace pressure, but only half of employees receive such support.
The report suggests stripping response speed and digital status indicators from appraisals, writing down what truly counts as urgent, and running weekly capacity reviews. However, the weak spot is the lack of authority for managers to implement these changes.
Written by urgent.news from e27's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.