Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Probing the neural geometry of conscious object perception in time

Conscious object recognition is a critical brain function, key to making sense of the plethora of visual inputs and guiding adaptive behavior. Yet, the sequence of neural processing underlying conscious object recognition remains unclear. Existing proposals alternatively suggest that conscious object recognition proceeds in a "coarse-to-fine" sequence or a "fine-to-coarse" sequence. Here, we…

Conscious object recognition is a vital brain function, enabling us to interpret visual stimuli and adapt our behavior accordingly. However, the exact sequence of neural processing leading to conscious object recognition remains unknown. Previous theories propose either a coarse-to-fine or a fine-to-coarse progression. To clarify this matter, researchers recorded high-density EEG while participants of both genders engaged in an object recognition task under various viewing conditions.

Early in neural activity, both superordinate and basic-level category information appeared. Subsequently, a late superordinate category representation emerged in an abstract format, separate from low-level object features. Interestingly, during the early stage, while basic-level category information correlated positively with perceptual awareness, superordinate category information correlated negatively.

Conversely, in the early stage, both superordinate and basic-level category information correlated positively with objective categorization accuracy. In the late stage, both category levels correlated positively with awareness. These findings imply that neural processing behind conscious object perception unfolds from the basic to the superordinate category level.

Written by urgent.news from bioRxiv's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at biorxiv.org →

More in AI

OpenAI and Anthropic call for new laws on artificial intelligence

OpenAI and Anthropic representatives told a UK parliamentary committee that voluntary pledges are insufficient and called for binding AI laws, statutory frameworks, and mandatory incident reporting.

  • OpenAI and Anthropic demand new AI laws in UK parliamentary hearing
  • Voluntary pledges insufficient, statutory frameworks and reporting required
  • Google DeepMind and Meta oppose new legal framework

Prompts don't enforce budgets. Signatures do.

A spending limit written in a prompt is not a control. It is a piece of text, sitting in the same context window as everything else the model reads, competing for the model's attention with the task…

  • Spending limits in prompts are not enforced by the model.
  • Real enforcement occurs through server-side checks.
  • Veyline performs scoped, signed authorization before transactions.

More from Wednesday 14 October →