Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Prompts don't enforce budgets. Signatures do.

A spending limit written in a prompt is not a control. It is a piece of text, sitting in the same context window as everything else the model reads, competing for the model's attention with the task, the tool output, and whatever a third party managed to get in front of it. When that limit and an instruction to spend disagree, nothing technical decides between them. The model decides. That is the…

Spending limits written in prompts are merely pieces of text within the same context window as the model's other inputs. When a spending limit conflicts with an instruction to spend, the model decides, not a technical enforcement mechanism. Veyline addresses this issue by enforcing budget controls outside the model through server-side checks.

The four properties of real enforcement are that the check occurs outside the model, the authorization is scoped and signed, and it fails closed. In practice, this means Veyline checks a scoped, signed authorization before any money moves. The free preflight evaluation allows users to test this enforcement without actually executing any transactions.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in AI

Log what your tools put in the context window before blaming the model

Ask an agent for one person's sales calls since February 1 and it can come back with calls that person wasn't on, even though the right ones were in its context.

  • Agent returned unrelated sales calls due to large context window
  • 30,000+ tokens consumed over a month and a half
  • Logging insertion point helps identify wrong claims

Test document extraction before an agent acts on it

An agent can follow its instructions perfectly and still pay the wrong amount, because the parser misread a table in the invoice. The agent never sees the PDF, only the extraction.

  • Agent relies on extracted data, not original PDF
  • Parser errors can cause workflow failure
  • Accuracy threshold advised at 95%

OpenAI and Anthropic call for new laws on artificial intelligence

OpenAI and Anthropic representatives told a UK parliamentary committee that voluntary pledges are insufficient and called for binding AI laws, statutory frameworks, and mandatory incident reporting.

  • OpenAI and Anthropic demand new AI laws in UK parliamentary hearing
  • Voluntary pledges insufficient, statutory frameworks and reporting required
  • Google DeepMind and Meta oppose new legal framework

More from Tuesday 13 October →