Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Election Commission to Bombay High Court: Non-appearance of name in draft SIR does not mean ‘deletion’

Election Commission to Bombay High Court: Non-appearance of name in draft SIR does not mean ‘deletion’

Justice Minister Yariv Levin asserted that a right-wing electoral triumph in Israel would result in a significantly different judicial system, encompassing alterations to the Supreme Court's composition, during remarks at a Sovereignty Movement conference in Jerusalem on Tuesday. Levin viewed the upcoming October 27 elections as a pivotal chance to push forward the judicial reform he has advocated since the establishment of the present administration.

He claimed that if the Right prevails, the subsequent term will feature different Supreme Court justices and a distinct judicial framework. Levin emphasized that the upcoming elections would determine whether the next administration could fundamentally reshape the Supreme Court, asserting that the impending turnover of justices would provide an opportunity to alter its ideological makeup.

He specified that approximately one-third of the judiciary appointments made during the incumbent government's tenure have been under his stewardship, but contended that opposition to change remains particularly robust at the Supreme Court. Levin accused the current judicial establishment of obstructing candidates with varying ideological viewpoints from entering the judiciary, claiming that the appointment system had consistently safeguarded entrenched political interests.

He criticized the status quo for shielding appointees who espoused different ideologies, alleging that these appointments were thwarted. The justice minister underscored the election's significance for Israel's security, national identity, immigration policy, and judicial framework, stating that the stakes transcended ordinary political contestation.

Levin accused the existing judicial establishment of impeding candidates with divergent ideological perspectives from entering the judiciary, arguing that the appointment system had long protected entrenched political interests.

Written by urgent.news from Jerusalem Post's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at indianexpress.com →

More in World

More from Tuesday 13 October →