arXiv imposes rate limit on paper submissions to stem the AI slop tide
Two a month per submitter, starting now, and you can thank science slop for the change
arXiv, the preprint paper repository, has implemented a cap of two new submissions per month per author, regardless of whether the work was produced by humans or with AI assistance. This new limit came into effect after arXiv, which moved to independent nonprofit status in the summer following 25 years under Cornell University’s guidance, decided to enforce stricter submission guidelines due to a surge in low-quality submissions, many of which are the result of AI tools.
The change, announced by community engagement manager Kat Boboris, also includes a limit of three active submissions at any given time. Active papers are those that have been submitted, are under review, but not yet published. Large institutions with multiple researchers are unlikely to be significantly affected as the limit is per submitter.
The number of submissions has skyrocketed, increasing 309 percent in the past decade and doubling in the last two years. Many recent submissions do not meet arXiv’s requirements for AI-assisted research, being deemed "thin" and "narrow in scope." This has led to an increase in moderators' workload and delays for quality submissions.
Tom Dietterich, chair of the arXiv editorial advisory council, expressed frustration that the flood of low-quality papers is unfair to those who consistently submit high-quality work. The new limit is a temporary measure while arXiv evaluates new submission practices, but will be reevaluated based on its impact on submissions rates and moderation load.
Meanwhile, arXiv urges researchers to prioritize quality submissions and consider submitting comprehensive papers instead of multiple smaller ones.
Written by urgent.news from The Register's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
