What therapists say about this new antidote for doomscrolling—and no, it’s not bricking your phone
With seemingly endless studies showing doomscrolling is bad for mental health , more people are rethinking their relationship with social media and digital content. Enter “bloomscrolling,” the latest trend on social media, which encourages people to intentionally and actively seek out uplifting and inspiring content online. According to experts, it reflects a broader shift away from passively…
Doomscrolling, the act of constantly consuming negative news online, has been shown to have detrimental effects on mental health. In response, a new trend called "bloomscrolling" is gaining popularity on social media. This practice involves intentionally seeking out uplifting and inspiring content to counteract the negative impact of doomscrolling. Experts believe that bloomscrolling reflects a shift away from passively consuming distressing news and towards making more conscious choices about the media we consume.
Sreela Roy-Greene, a therapist at BetterHelp, explains that bloomscrolling is not about ignoring difficult realities or forcing oneself to feel positive. Instead, it encourages making mindful decisions to ensure that internet consumption leaves us feeling informed, connected, and not overwhelmed or depleted. By consciously curating our digital space, we can shape our thoughts, emotions, and overall well-being, much like maintaining a balanced diet.
The trend of bloomscrolling aligns with a growing awareness of the importance of mental health and the need to find a balance in our media consumption. As more people recognize the negative consequences of excessive doomscrolling, they are taking steps to curate their feeds, leading to a surge in searches for "offline hobbies" and the phrase "no phone ideas."
This shift suggests that the instinct to curate one's digital space extends beyond social media and into real-life activities, promoting a healthier relationship with technology.
Written by urgent.news from Fast Company's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.