Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Is there a difference between being smart and acting smart?

Although intelligence is one of the most consistent and important predictors of real-life success, the connection is by no means perfect. This explains why we all know people who we consider “smart” in a traditional sense (e.g., knowledgeable, bookish, geeky, and mathematically sharp), but who seem to malfunction in everyday life. In fact, decades of scientific research show that intellectual and…

Is there a difference between being smart and acting smart?

Intelligence is a strong predictor of real-life success, but it doesn't guarantee that individuals will excel socially. Many people who are considered intelligent, such as being knowledgeable or mathematically sharp, can still struggle in everyday social situations. Decades of research indicates that intellectual and emotional intelligence are only weakly related, meaning that being highly intelligent doesn't automatically translate to being adept at interpersonal interactions.

Fictional examples of highly intelligent individuals who fail at basic social skills include characters like Sheldon Cooper from "The Big Bang Theory," Sherlock Holmes, and Mark Zuckerberg in "The Social Network."

This disconnect between high cognitive ability and poor social skills may be due to empathy deficits, neuroatypical patterns similar to those on the autism spectrum, or a combination of factors. While some researchers attribute this mismatch to "spectrum" traits emphasizing systemizing abilities over empathizing abilities, the broader concept of "neurodiversity" encompasses a wide range of traits and conditions that are difficult to pinpoint precisely.

For those who are legitimately deemed "smart," "clever," or "intelligent," there are several reasons why they might act unintelligently or even "dumb." High-pressure situations can impair clear thinking, leading to nervousness, anxiety, and stress. In high-pressure scenarios, the validity of IQ tests is undermined, making pressure a common factor in real-world intelligence assessment.

Furthermore, likability plays a significant role in social judgment, as people tend to favor those who share their interests, values, and appear similar to themselves. Being highly intelligent may make an individual less likable to others, as they may be viewed as different and less relatable.

Intellectual humility versus arrogance is another factor. While self-awareness of one's intelligence can be beneficial, overly confident or arrogant behavior can alienate others. It is more effective to balance intelligence with interpersonal skills, appearing humble and approachable rather than appearing as the most intelligent person in the room.

Additionally, intellectually brilliant people might struggle with everyday life because it may seem trivial compared to their deeper interests. For instance, famous figures like Isaac Newton, Marie Curie, or Einstein might have found it difficult to prioritize mundane tasks, preferring to focus on abstract, consequential problems like gravity, radioactivity, or evolution.

Written by urgent.news from Fast Company's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at fastcompany.com →

More in Science

CityUHK researchers refine spatial omics techniques for clinical diagnostics

Scientists at City University of Hong Kong developed refined spatial omics mapping techniques to track molecular distributions within cellular structures for routine clinical tissue analysis…

  • CityUHK researchers develop Spectrum-FISH method for spatial analysis of tissue.
  • Touch-and-go molecular fishing strategy preserves spatial information in tissue samples.

Scientists explain how a 300 TeV photon could reach Earth

A mysterious signal from a powerful gamma-ray burst may reveal how exotic particles and altered physics could let extreme radiation cross the universe The post Scientists explain how a 300 TeV photon…

  • 300 TeV photon observed by LHAASO on 9 October 2022
  • Two speculative mechanisms: axion-like particles and Lorentz invariance violation
  • Observations require multiple distant sources to confirm

More from Wednesday 30 September →