Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Distributed API Rate Limiting & Idempotency at Scale: Redis Keyspace Architecture & Lock Patterns

Distributed API Rate Limiting & Idempotency at Scale: Redis Keyspace Architecture & Lock Patterns Protecting high-throughput public APIs requires two non-negotiable guarantees: shielding downstream services from traffic spikes and guaranteeing that duplicate client payloads execute exactly once. Here is how to engineer scalable rate-limiting and idempotency subsystems using Redis. 1. Distributed…

Distributed API rate limiting and idempotency at scale rely on two key guarantees: protecting downstream services from traffic spikes and ensuring duplicate client payloads execute exactly once. Redis keyspace architecture offers a scalable solution for implementing these guarantees.

Distributed rate limiting can be achieved through the Sliding Window Log Pattern using Redis sorted sets. This approach tracks request timestamps in a sliding window range, prunes expired tokens atomically, and evaluates current volume in O(log N + M) time complexity. The Lua script provided demonstrates how to implement this pattern in Redis.

Idempotency is crucial for preventing duplicate side effects caused by network timeouts, client retries, or webhook delivery loops. By intercepting requests containing an Idempotency-Key HTTP header, a state machine manages the request lifecycle. The server enters an IN_PROGRESS state with a short TTL lock, followed by a COMPLETED state where the response is cached in Redis with a long TTL.

If an unhandled error occurs, the lock is immediately released to allow retries. Implementing this pattern as a middleware interceptor in Fastify/Express ensures efficient processing of idempotent requests.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

Polymarket Execution Verification: When “Filled” Doesn’t Mean Settled

A Polymarket trading bot can receive a successful execution response and still not know enough to safely continue trading. That sounds like a small implementation detail. It isn't.

  • Polymarket's bot receives execution responses even before full settlement.
  • System distinguishes between trade completion and transaction information availability.
  • Explicit state machine needed to avoid incorrect assumptions about trade status.

Moving on-premises block storage to AWS? The "divide by 625 MBps" sizing approach comes out wrong

Moving on-premises block storage to AWS? The "divide by 625 MBps" sizing approach comes out wrong — measured session and queue counts What this article does and does not cover: it covers the measured…

  • Dividing throughput by 625 MBps to determine sessions is inaccurate.
  • Testing shows method fails to capture system's true potential.
  • Approach not recommended for AWS block storage sizing.

More from Wednesday 30 September →