The Leftist Split Over AI Doom
The left wants AI regulation. They just can't agree on what it should look like or how concerned they should be.
The left-wing activist group DSA's Tech Action Working Group, based in New York City, recently published a post on Instagram that expressed concerns over the potential catastrophic consequences of artificial intelligence. The post garnered over 25,000 likes, but not everyone agreed with its message. Some argued that focusing on theoretical concerns about AI could divert attention and resources away from addressing the actual harms that AI technology is already causing.
Senator Bernie Sanders, a key figure on the American left, has become a prominent voice advocating for AI safety. He has taken a direct approach to the issue, proposing legislation aimed at putting federal regulations in place to protect the future of humanity. Sanders' stance on this matter has led him into alliances with unconventional figures, such as Steve Bannon, a right-wing populist. His advocacy has inspired a number of left-wing candidates to pledge support for regulating AI to prevent existential threats.
However, not all on the left are on board with Sanders' approach. Some critics argue that elevating theoretical concerns about AI could empower the companies developing these technologies, rather than focusing on the existing harms caused by unregulated AI. They argue that it's possible to tackle both the current and future harms of AI simultaneously.
AI researcher and tech industry critic Timnit Gebru has accused Sanders and others on the left of following "doomsday eugenicist cults," referencing the effective altruist and rationalist philosophies that underpin many AI safety conversations. Critics also express concerns about Sanders' moves, saying that they may be inspired by a desire for investment from venture capitalists, who are drawn to the potential for high returns on investments in frontier AI labs.
Despite the controversy, proponents of Sanders' approach argue that public and media attention generated by the AI safety discourse can ultimately benefit frontier labs. They believe that these conversations will lead to stronger regulations and risk mitigation measures, as companies will need to demonstrate their commitment to addressing the worst risks.
Written by urgent.news from Wired's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.