Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Polarized trust in scientists driven by values, identity and politics

Trust in scientists in the UK is strong overall, with 63% indicating they have high trust in scientists in general—but a major new study finds this trust is closely shaped by people's values, identity and politics, showing some of the same patterns of division over science that have emerged in the U.S.

Polarized trust in scientists driven by values, identity and politics

Trust in scientists in the UK is generally high, with 63% of people expressing high levels of trust in scientists in general. However, a new study reveals that this trust is closely tied to people's values, identity, and political beliefs, mirroring the divisions seen in the United States. The research indicates that people are more likely to trust scientists who align with their own values and who they perceive as working for their benefit.

This connection to shared identity is a powerful driver of trust, but it also risks being influenced by growing political polarization. For instance, trust in climate scientists varies widely, ranging from 84% among Green supporters to just 19% among Reform UK supporters—a significant political divide. The study, led by the Policy Institute at King's College London and funded by Wellcome, surveyed 4,262 UK adults and identified several key factors influencing trust.

Knowing a scientist personally enhances trust, regardless of one's occupation or educational level. However, outright distrust remains a minority position. To boost trust in the future, scientists should focus on transparent communication, demonstrating how research benefits people, and engaging directly with those affected by their work.

This targeted approach can help bridge the gap between political identities and science, ensuring that trust in science remains actively earned in an increasingly polarized society.

Written by urgent.news from Phys.org's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at phys.org →

More in Science

Q&A: Satellite imagery reveals what casualty figures alone do not tell us

How do we form a picture of conflicts? A new study published in the journal Nature explores how different types of data can be combined to give a fuller understanding of armed conflicts. Lead author Valerie Sticher uses the examples of Ukraine and Myanmar to explain the advantages and limitations of automatically analyzed satellite data.

More from Thursday 10 September →