A sovereign Lebanon serves Israel and Iran alike
Were Iran and Israel to accept Lebanon’s status as a sovereign state, not only would this be a principled decision – one that is in accordance with the universal values enshrined in the UN Charter – it would also serve both countries’ long-term interests. Today, unfortunately, both these regional powers use Lebanon as a space to jockey for influence and settle disputes against one another. They…
Lebanon stands as a sovereign nation, yet both Iran and Israel exploit its territory, institutions, and people to their own advantage. The UN Charter supports Lebanon's sovereignty as a universal value. However, the regional powers continue to use Lebanon as a tool for influence and dispute resolution. Israel's military presence in southern Lebanon, particularly the expansion beyond the "yellow line," poses a direct threat to Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Israel's actions, driven by security concerns, involve demolishing homes and restricting residents' access to their land. These actions are detrimental to Lebanon's sovereignty and do not contribute to lasting peace. Iran's support for Hezbollah has historically given Iran undue influence over Lebanese affairs, often leading the country into conflicts with Israel.
The recent controversy surrounding Iran's ambassador refusing to leave Lebanon is another example of Tehran's high-handed approach. Beirut's decision to revoke Sheibani's diplomatic status and demand direct communication through state institutions signifies a shift in Lebanon's resolve. This move reflects Hezbollah's waning influence and demonstrates Beirut's determination to reclaim sovereignty.
Lebanon's position at the crossroads of competing interests, including those of Israel, Iran, Turkey, and others, highlights the need for a strong and independent Lebanon. However, the country's recovery from years of economic decline and conflict requires support and cooperation from other nations. Israel's encroachments and Iran's intransigence hinder progress, but neither will secure Lebanon's long-term interests.
A viable alternative is for the region to build mutually beneficial partnerships directly with Beirut, rather than treating Lebanon as a buffer zone, battlefield, or bargaining chip. The UAE and Syria are examples of countries focusing on such partnerships. Treating Lebanon as a sovereign nation is essential for fostering stability and prosperity in the Levant.
Written by urgent.news from The National Business's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
