Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Is Someone Hacking DoD Refrigerators?

It sure seems like it. The stores confirmed to be affected include Fort Irwin , Calif.; F.E. Warren Air Force Base , Wyo.; Fort Huachuca , Ariz.; Naval Station Newport , R.I.; Columbus Air Force Base , Miss.; and Travis Air Force Base , Calif., according to announcements made online by each installation. Naval Air Station Lemoore, Calif., also experienced an outage, according to M. Elizabeth,…

Refrigeration issues have been plaguing multiple Department of Defense commissaries across the United States, leaving many to wonder if they are the result of a cyberattack. The installations impacted include Fort Irwin in California, F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, Fort Huachuca in Arizona, Naval Station Newport in Rhode Island, Columbus Air Force Base in Mississippi, Travis Air Force Base in California, and Naval Air Station Lemoore in California.

However, the exact number of bases affected remains undisclosed to the public, with each installation referring all inquiries to the Defense Department.

The Defense Department has acknowledged a possible refrigeration disruption at some Defense Commissary Agency commissaries, but has not disclosed further details. A Defense official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, stated that the department is aware of the issue but is not authorized to comment publicly. This incident has raised concerns among officials, as the timing of these outages seems too coincidental to be attributed to mere technical glitches.

Despite Pentagon officials' reluctance to provide answers, many speculate that a cyberattack may be behind the refrigeration problems, though this remains unconfirmed at this time.

Written by urgent.news from Schneier on Security's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at schneier.com →

More in Tech

How to Connect Codex to a Custom Responses API Provider and Verify the Route

Changing an API base URL is not enough to prove that Codex is using the provider you intended. Codex is an agentic client. It needs more than a model that can return text.

  • Codex requires compatibility with Responses API behavior
  • Four key decisions: model, provider, base URL, API key
  • wireapi = responses indicates use of Responses API

They steal your database and cannot crack a single password

Picture the worst Monday: someone walked off with a dump of your users table. Emails, names, and the password column. The good news is that you do not store passwords in the clear — you store hashes…

  • Malicious actor can steal users table with hashed passwords
  • Argon2id makes each attack costly in memory and time
  • OPRF solution makes secret live in separate service

More from Monday 31 August →