Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Apple Seemingly Made a Mistake When Announcing the New Mac Studio

Apple's press release for the new Mac Studio with M5 Max and M5 Ultra chips last week initially stated that the computer had "next-generation SSD architecture built on PCIe Gen 6." However, as spotted by the French blog MacGeneration , Apple removed the PCIe 6.0 mention from the announcement shortly after it was published. The press release still mentions that the new Mac Studio has a…

Apple Seemingly Made a Mistake When Announcing the New Mac Studio

In the wake of Apple's recent press release unveiling the new Mac Studio equipped with M5 Max and M5 Ultra chips, an apparent error came to light. Initially, Apple had stated that the computer boasted next-generation SSD architecture built on PCIe Gen 6. However, the French blog MacGeneration promptly noted that Apple had hastily removed the PCIe 6.0 reference shortly after the announcement went live.

The press release retained the claim of a next-generation SSD architecture delivering up to twice the storage speeds of its predecessor, eliminating any mention of PCIe 6.0. As of now, Apple has not yet addressed the potential mistake in the press release.

It is more probable that Apple inadvertently overlooked the PCIe 5.0 standard for the new Mac Studio. This notion is supported by two key points: firstly, the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models, featuring the same M5 Max chip as the new Mac Studio, already incorporate SSDs with PCIe 5.0 support, and Apple confidently touted up to twice the storage speeds for these laptops.

Secondly, the market remains devoid of consumer PCs currently offering SSDs with PCIe 6.0 compatibility. Although the M5 Ultra chip is entirely novel, it is highly likely it supports PCIe 5.0 as well, otherwise, Apple would not have necessitated a press release amendment. Consequently, the new Mac Studio seems to support PCIe 5.0, not PCIe 6.0.

Written by urgent.news from MacRumors's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at macrumors.com →

More in Tech

How to Connect Codex to a Custom Responses API Provider and Verify the Route

Changing an API base URL is not enough to prove that Codex is using the provider you intended. Codex is an agentic client. It needs more than a model that can return text.

  • Codex requires compatibility with Responses API behavior
  • Four key decisions: model, provider, base URL, API key
  • wireapi = responses indicates use of Responses API

They steal your database and cannot crack a single password

Picture the worst Monday: someone walked off with a dump of your users table. Emails, names, and the password column. The good news is that you do not store passwords in the clear — you store hashes…

  • Malicious actor can steal users table with hashed passwords
  • Argon2id makes each attack costly in memory and time
  • OPRF solution makes secret live in separate service

Is Someone Hacking DoD Refrigerators?

It sure seems like it. The stores confirmed to be affected include Fort Irwin , Calif.; F.E. Warren Air Force Base , Wyo.; Fort Huachuca , Ariz.; Naval Station Newport , R.I.; Columbus Air Force Base…

More from Monday 31 August →