Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Business

Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra with faster performance and AI compute

M5 Ultra combines two dual-die M5 Max processors through Apple’s next-generation UltraFusion interconnect

Apple unveiled two new chips and two upgraded desktop computers today. The M6 chip marks Apple's debut in 2nm technology, while the M5 Ultra boasts a quad-die design and represents the company's most powerful silicon to date. The desktops themselves do not feature substantial new features, but they carry significant price and specification enhancements.

The changes in recent years revolve around who these machines cater to and whether consumers can acquire them. The M6 chip transitions to TSMC's 2nm process and is the first Apple System-on-Chip to integrate all three core types simultaneously. It boasts 12 cores: two super cores, four performance cores, and six efficiency cores.

Apple asserts the M6 achieves the world's fastest single-threaded performance, 1.2 times the multithreaded throughput of the M5, and a 40% improvement in CPU performance over the M4. The GPU transitions to 12 cores, paired with a Neural Accelerator in each one, delivering nearly 30% more peak GPU compute for AI compared to the M5.

Additionally, the chip includes a dual 16-core Neural Engine that can be accessed concurrently by system frameworks, storage with twice the speed (15GB/s), and up to 170GB/s of memory bandwidth. Memory capacity is capped at 32GB, which holds more significance than it may initially appear. The Ultra model stands out as the more intriguing chip.

Apple's UltraFusion interconnect fuses two dual-die M5 Max chips into a singular quad-die package, offering inter-die bandwidth exceeding 4.4TB/s and more than 6 times the connection density of the previous version. This configuration yields up to 36 CPU cores (12 super, 24 performance), up to 80 GPU cores, a 32-core Neural Engine, and up to 512GB of unified memory running at 1.2TB/s.

Apple claims a 4.5 times increase in peak GPU compute for AI compared to the M3 Ultra and a 40% enhancement in graphics performance. The cheaper Mac receives the latest process node, while the flagship chip retains the M5's 3nm process. Although this may seem counterintuitive, it implies that the M5 Ultra represents a more substantial leap than the M6 in AI workloads.

We have previously reported that Apple does not plan to introduce M6 Pro or M6 Max, advancing directly to the M7 in mid-2027. Apple released macOS 26.2 last December, introducing support for low-latency communication between Thunderbolt 5 hosts, specifically tailored for distributed inference using MLX. Since then, enthusiasts and developers have been linking Mac minis and Mac Studios to run models far larger than any single consumer machine could handle, serving as an alternative to purchasing multiple Nvidia hardware units.

The Mac Studio now officially supports clustering over Thunderbolt 5 with Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA), enabling memory pooling across systems. Apple claims that four clustered Studios can achieve up to 3 times the inference throughput of a single machine. A new Core AI framework accompanies MLX. The Studio is positioned as the ultimate desktop for on-device AI, while the mini functions as an always-on agentic machine.

Currently, the economics of this approach are straightforward. Developers are deploying cloud coding agents while monitoring mounting token bills, and open-weight models like Qwen and DeepSeek can handle a significant portion of the same work on local hardware. However, standard consumer machines still lack the capability to hold models large enough to replace a frontier API, which explains why individuals began chaining Macs together in the first place.

This shift is noteworthy for a product that was previously considered an afterthought in Apple's Mac lineup. The mini accounts for approximately 3% of Mac unit sales in the US, as reported by Consumer Intelligence Research. The M6 mini starts at $899, while the M5 Pro mini is priced at $1,699, both $100 higher than the current M4 and M4 Pro models.

The Mac Studio begins at $2,499 with the M5 Max, equivalent to the current M4 Max model, and $5,499 with the M5 Ultra, a $200 increase from the M3 Ultra model. These comparisons appear favorable for Apple, yet this is due to the baseline having already been raised. The M4 mini launched at $599 in October 2024. Apple discontinued that configuration in May, raising Mac prices by roughly 15% to 20% in late June, stating that these increases were necessary due to component costs.

Consequently, the most affordable way to enter Apple's desktop lineup is up 50% over the past two months, and it comes with 16GB of memory and a 256GB SSD. Upgrades are prohibitively expensive. An additional 8GB costs $200. Reaching the M6's 32GB limit incurs an additional $400. A fully upgraded Mac Studio exceeds $15,000. This trend is not exclusive to Apple; DRAM pricing surged approximately 90% quarter-over-quarter in Q1 2026 and another 50% or more in Q2.

IDC describes this as a "structural reallocation of wafer capacity" rather than a typical cycle, as every wafer dedicated to AI HBM becomes unavailable for regular RAM in laptops. Consequently, companies like Microsoft, Asus, MSI, Nintendo, Sony, and Valve have raised hardware prices this year. Demand has already outpaced supply for the outgoing Mac mini and Studio, with some configurations experiencing weeks or months of waiting periods.

Apple removed its largest memory options early in 2026 and has struggled to maintain stock for certain MacBook models. The new mini and Studio now reach memory capacities of up to 512GB, but these configurations become available in late October. All other models launch on September 22, with pre-orders starting at that time. Apple recently showcased a Mac mini assembly line in Houston, set to commence production later in the year.

The company emphasizes that a higher initial hardware cost may prove more cost-effective than ongoing AI service fees, but this only holds true if consumers can actually purchase the hardware. Performance claims made by Apple are based on their own assessments, using the standard "up to" phrasing and benchmarks against different baselines, such as M1, M4, and M3 Ultra.

One additional context is that Tim Cook recently addressed the company's financial performance and strategic direction.

Written by urgent.news from TechSpot's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at arabianbusiness.com →

More in Business

What are the results of high-paying CEOs? In Korea, it is only considered over 3 years, but in the US and UK, it is considered over 5-10 years. 국내 상장사 10곳 중 7곳의 최고경영자(CEO) 성과가 3년 이상 장기적으로 평가되지 않는 것으로 나타났다. Of the listed companies in Korea, 7 out of 10 companies do not evaluate their CEOs' performances over a long-term period of 3 years or more. 21일 기업평가사이트 CEO스코어(대표 김승훈)가 국내 500대 상장사 CEO 496명의 성과 평가 기간을 조사한 결과, 3년 미만으로 평가하는 곳이 68.1%(338명)에 달했다. On the 21st, CEO Score, a corporate evaluation site, surveyed the performance evaluation periods of 496 CEOs of the top 500 listed companies in Korea and found that 68.1% (338 people) evaluate their performances in less than 3 years. 1년 만으로 평가하는 곳도 18.1%(90명)였다. 18.1% (90 people) of the companies evaluate their CEOs' performances in just one year. 3년은 49.6%(246명), 5년은 21.2%(105명), 10년은 9.7%(48명)였다. 49.6% (246 people) evaluate their performances over 3 years, 21.2% (105 people) over 5 years, and 9.7% (48 people) over 10 years. 미국과 영국 등 선진국은 5년에서 10년 단위로 CEO 성과를 평가하는 곳이 많다. In developed countries such as the US and UK, many evaluate their CEOs' performances over a period of 5 to 10 years. 2019년 5월 미국 경영자협회(ASA)가 발표한 ‘CEO 평가 가이드’에 따르면, 52%의 기업이 3년, 24%가 5년, 16%가 3년 이상으로 평가 기간을 설정하고 있다. According to the "CEO Evaluation Guide" published by the American Management Association (ASA) in May 2019, 52% of companies set their evaluation period at 3 years, 24% at 5 years, and 16% at more than 3 years. 영국은 상황이 더하다. The situation is even more extreme in the UK. 지난해 7월 영국 상장사 350곳의 의결권 자문사인 인스티튜셔널 쉐어홀더 서비스(ISS)가 조사한 결과, 10곳 중 8곳이 5년 이상의 장기 성과 측정 지표를 평가하고 있다. In July last year, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a voting rights advisory firm for 350 listed companies in the UK, found that 8 out of 10 companies evaluate long-term performance measurement indicators of more than 5 years. ISS는 보고서에서 “장기 성과 지표는 CEO가 단기 성과에만 집중하지 않고 지속가능경영을 추구하도록 돕는다”며 “장기 성과 지표는 주주총회에서 경영진의 성과 평가에 사용된다”고 설명했다. In the report, ISS stated that "Long-term performance indicators help CEOs focus on sustainable management rather than short-term performance, and are used to evaluate management performance at general meetings of shareholders." 한국 기업들도 이 같은 장기 성과 평가 제도를 도입해야 한다는 목소리가 높다. There is a high demand for Korean companies to adopt such a long-term performance evaluation system. 기업 지배구조 전문가인 정구현 서울대 경영학과 교수는 “한국은 주주가 단기간에 주식을 매도하는 비율이 높은 만큼, 경영진이 장기 성과에 집중할 수 있는 경영 환경을 만들어줘야 한다”고 말했다. Prof. Chung Koo-hyun, an expert on corporate governance and a professor at Seoul National University's business school, said, "In Korea, shareholders sell their stocks over a short period of time, so we need to create a management environment where management can focus on long-term performance." 그러면서 “이를 위해 이사회가 CEO 성과 평가에 적극적으로 나서야 한다”고 덧붙였다. He added, "To achieve this, the board of directors should take an active role in evaluating the CEO's performance."

More from Tuesday 25 August →