Urgent.News

One page, thousands of outlets. See who else covered it.

Editions

World

DAP staying in govt with eye on GE16, says analyst

Sivamurugan Pandian says this gives DAP access to policymaking power and influence, but also means sharing the blame for government failures.

DAP staying in govt with eye on GE16, says analyst

The Democratic Action Party (DAP) has decided to remain in its unity government positions until the end of the parliamentary term, a strategic move to retain influence ahead of the next general election (GE16), according to political analyst Sivamurugan Pandian of Universiti Sains Malaysia. By being in government, DAP gains access to power and influence in policymaking, a crucial advantage as they approach the upcoming election.

However, staying in government also means sharing the blame for any weaknesses or failures of the unity government, presenting a double-edged sword.

Sivamurugan emphasized that withdrawing from government positions could potentially boost DAP's image as a free and principled party, but the loss of administrative influence would be a greater risk with GE16 looming. At the special congress on Sunday, 1,857 out of 2,099 DAP delegates voted in favor of remaining in the government. This decision was made after DAP faced defeats in various state elections, with the party remaining the best-performing component of the ruling Pakatan Harapan coalition.

DAP's decision to stay in government is seen as a pragmatic move to ensure that the party continues to have a seat at the decision-making table. The political cost of leaving the government is deemed much higher than the potential benefits DAP could gain. While some argue that this move may be seen as a betrayal of DAP's principles, Sivamurugan believes that the party is adapting to political realities.

Power without principles could erode the party's identity, making it essential for DAP to convince its grassroots that remaining a key participant in the unity government aligns with its mandate and aspirations. The outcome of GE16 will ultimately determine the validity of this decision.

Written by urgent.news from Free Malaysia Today's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at freemalaysiatoday.com →

More in World

News in Easy English: Sapporo couple fight Japan's law on family names

SAPPORO -- A lawsuit in Japan about family names after marriage is now at an important time. A couple in Sapporo sued the state. They say parts of the

  • Kiyotaka Nishi and Mana Sato challenge Japan's surname law in court.
  • Couple argues law violates Constitution's individual respect guarantee.
  • Survey shows 78% of married people don't discuss surname changes pre-marriage.

More from Tuesday 18 August →