Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Berlin rental housing confiscation debate… “Reality of working half a month for rent business”

Translated from Korean Read in Korean

In Berlin, the debate over "housing rent seizures" (housing socialization) resurfaced ahead of the crucial September 20th election. The concept of housing socialization gained majority support in a resident vote nearly five years ago, but has remained largely unimplemented. Luigia Panizzon, co-rapporteur of the left-wing party, expressed Berlin's commitment to supporting residents' desire for large-scale housing projects to be socialized in a recent ZDF interview.

Panizzon highlighted the plight of citizens who work a portion of each month for large property companies like BonoVia and DiethelmBuenen. The primary cause of skyrocketing Berlin rent prices, she concluded, is landlords' excessive profit-seeking. According to the Berlin Investment Bank, Berlin's rent per square meter increased 75% in the past year compared to 10 years ago, reaching 15.78 euros (about 26,000 won) per square meter.

The debate over housing socialization in Berlin dates back to September 2021, when a resident vote was held to seize ownership of approximately 200,000 German large real estate holdings. The German Basic Law's Article 15 provided legal basis for this proposal, stating that land, natural resources, and production means can be shared as public assets.

However, despite the majority vote, significant changes have not materialized in the past five years. The conservative camp, led by Berlin mayor Steinbrink, criticized the concept of compulsory land acquisition as unfeasible and potentially stifling new housing construction. On the other hand, opposition parties, including the Social Democratic Party's candidate for Berlin mayor, emphasized the need for binding resident votes on housing socialization as a condition for forming the next government.

The housing socialization issue is expected to become a central point of contention in coalition negotiations following the election.

Written by urgent.news from Hankyoreh's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at hani.co.kr →

More in World

U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he could also demand reparations from Iran, further complicating an already tense situation in the Persian Gulf. The comments came as Iran warned that it could shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for international oil shipments, if it was not able to export its own oil due to U.S. sanctions. Trump made the remarks at a news conference with Finnish President Sauli Niinistö at the White House. "Iran has done a lot of bad things, and they could make a big payment, you know, for the things they've done," Trump said. The Strait of Hormuz has been a critical flashpoint in the escalating tensions between the United States and Iran. About 20% of the world's oil supply passes through the strait, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in response to the U.S. sanctions that were reimposed after Trump withdrew the United States from a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. The threat was reiterated on Tuesday by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, who said that Iran could close the strait if it was not allowed to sell its oil. "If we are not allowed to sell our oil, we will not be able to sell oil to anyone, and we will close the Strait of Hormuz," Rouhani said in a speech in Tehran. The comments by Trump and Rouhani came as oil prices jumped to a six-month high on Wednesday, fueled by the rising tensions in the region. Global benchmark Brent crude rose 4.3% to $67.54 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude gained 4.2% to $56.23 a barrel. The U.S. Treasury Department on Tuesday imposed sanctions on two Iranian shipping companies and a number of vessels, in a move aimed at further tightening the screws on Iran's oil exports. The latest development raised concerns about a potential conflict in the region, with some analysts warning that a war between the United States and Iran could have serious consequences for the global economy. "This is a powder keg situation, and it could easily escalate into a bigger conflict," said Helima Croft, head of commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets. "There are a lot of moving parts here, and it's hard to predict exactly how this will play out."

More from Monday 10 August →