Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

The AI ‘news’ accounts hyping a blue-state dystopia

AI-generated videos are flooding YouTube with fake narratives about chaos in California and New York.

The AI ‘news’ accounts hyping a blue-state dystopia

In January, President Donald Trump posted a false claim on social media, alleging that Walmart was closing hundreds of stores in California. While the claim was debunked, it revealed a growing issue of AI-assisted spam, particularly against California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is a potential presidential candidate in 2028. California's communications team expressed concern over the lack of clarity regarding the origin and nature of these videos, which were mostly from AI-generated sources.

One such account, @MeganWright62, populating mostly sensational AI-generated videos, claimed various companies were leaving California, grocery stores running out of food, and school teachers quitting en masse. The governor's team has been pushing for these accounts to be taken down, focusing on AI-generated spam content. So far, over 700 accounts have been removed since January through YouTube's "likeness protection" program, aimed at protecting public figures, creators, and journalists from deepfakes.

However, the AI spam issue seems to be worsening, with algorithms rewarding false narratives and bad actors taking advantage of the situation. This trend is not limited to California; similar accounts have emerged in New York and Illinois, creating alarmist content about the economic decline of Democrat-run states. Despite major platforms like YouTube partnering with content creators and journalists to combat the issue, experts warn that unless there are significant systemic changes, the problem will continue and might worsen.

Written by urgent.news from Semafor's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at semafor.com →

More in AI

You Won’t Know How Much to Delegate to AI Until You Use It Extensively

TL;DR How much you can delegate to AI, and how much human review it needs, depends on the task and the model. Tasks with few possible solutions and easy rollback are easier to delegate. Tasks with many possible solutions, product-policy implications, or long-term maintenance impact need human decision-making alongside AI.

Three AI Reviews Passed. One Real Legal Case Broke the System.

I had a system that looked ready. One AI model designed the architecture. Another implemented it. Additional models reviewed the output, checked the logic, and produced validation documents. Synthetic legal cases passed several internal checks. Then I tested the system with documents from a real legal case. It confused the parties.

More from Monday 3 August →