Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Ataques autónomos con Cairn entran en 10 organizaciones

Los ataques autónomos con Cairn entraron en 10 organizaciones de las 19 marcadas como blanco. Unit 42, el equipo de inteligencia de amenazas de Palo Alto Networks, publicó el informe el 12 de noviembre: entre agosto y septiembre de 2026, atacantes de habla china corrieron 25 operaciones con Cairn, un marco abierto de pruebas de penetración, y lograron acceso o extracción de datos en más de la…

Original Spanish Read in English

Autonomous attacks using Cairn targeting 10 out of 19 marked organizations were documented by Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 in a report published on November 12, 2026. Over a period spanning from August to September of the same year, Chinese-speaking attackers carried out 25 operations using Cairn, an open-source penetration testing framework, and succeeded in gaining access or extracting data from over half of the targets.

The report highlights the efficiency of a small team or even a single operator in orchestrating these operations, conducting simultaneous intrusions against 19 organizations within two weeks.

Each operation began with a minimal setup, involving a root domain and a target, and was automated to proceed without human intervention. Cairn coordinated its agents through a shared board, where each confirmed finding was recorded as a fixed fact, and each subsequent step was treated as an intention to be tested. The loop continued until the objective was achieved, all options were exhausted, or the operator intervened.

Operation durations ranged from 20 minutes to over 50 hours, with no set limit imposed by the attackers.

The attackers exclusively used Chinese models, with 13 operations involving GLM 5.2 from Zhipu, 8 utilizing DeepSeek V4 Flash, and 4 employing DeepSeek V4 Pro. For targets resistant to Flash, DeepSeek Pro was used as an alternative. Cairn had been modified for this campaign, hosted from Hong Kong, and included an AIScan Runner Skills package not found in the public version.

The model defenses were bypassed using a known trick: each order contained Chinese text presenting the task as an authorized test, prohibiting refusal, and each operation generated an AUTHORIZATION.md file declaring the order approved by a client. Neither GLM 5.2 nor DeepSeek objected to this framework, according to Unit 42's report, which was also noted by Help Net Security.

This campaign differs from a previous one reported in October, where the focus was on sealed Cairn panels and financially motivated groups targeting online retail stores. The new message emphasizes Unit 42's assessment of this activity, crediting it with moderate confidence as intelligence gathering linked to China, based on the artifacts' language and target selection.

The targets include semiconductor supply chain and defense entities, as well as civil rights organizations and civil society groups, such as a Canadian body and a U.S. teachers' union. The latter group experienced a breach due to an authentication bypass in their content manager, exposing over a million employee records, including contact information and hashed passwords.

The semiconductor manufacturer was breached through forced credential escalation in multiple application accounts, granting the attacker access to sensitive data, user lists, email addresses, and an unauthorized administrator account with persistent access to the programming interface. A technical standards organization was compromised due to weak passwords, granting the attackers access to internal bases.

Another attack involved writing unauthorized data to a cloud-based voting platform, granting the attackers arbitrary client privileges with read, write, and delete access to meetings and votes. Lastly, an open registry in an industrial automation program allowed the attackers to expose approximately 150,000 internal documents.

Unit 42's analysis suggests that these autonomous attacks have increased the volume and coverage of exploitation, rather than their complexity, and that the key to mitigation remains strong identity hygiene, reduced attack surface, and timely patching. The report concludes with a forecast from Unit 42's analysts: such campaigns will become more common as powerful autonomous models with weak safeguards gain prominence.

Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dev.to →

More in Tech

Agent Access: How Do You Scope an Agent's Permissions Safely?

I used AI tools to help draft and edit this post. I checked the facts and the wording, and the original lives at geekindata.com . The diagrams are on that page. Front door. Catalog. Corpus.

  • Implement sign-in group for shell with limited access, not full permissions.
  • Backend app roles enforce agent access and knowledge category access on sensitive calls.
  • SPA consumes capability endpoints, not parsing roles from JWT, to maintain single access payload.

Replacing objects in images: what the model changes

An image model can make a convincing replacement and still put it through another object or change something nearby. It can also turn a leather sofa beige while leaving leather creases in what should…

  • Muse model changes objects in images while altering nearby elements
  • 12 out of 15 edits were usable, Meta Muse most successful
  • Text prompts and image references produce varying results

TE 1888247 is an SFP+ connector, not an SFP cage: what to match when you need an alternative

TE Connectivity part number 1888247 is a 20-position SFP+ board-side connector (receptacle) , not an SFP cage. On TE's product pages, both 1888247-1 and 1888247-2 are described as "SFP+, Connector…

  • TE 1888247 is a 20-position SFP+ connector, not a cage
  • Two variants exist: 1888247-1 and 1888247-2, differing in gold plating thickness
  • Alternatives require matching 20-position SFP+ connector and compatible cage

HotGo Let the Client Choose the SMS Login Verification Code

HotGo Let the Client Choose the SMS Login Verification Code An SMS verification code is useful only when the server controls its value and ties it to one login attempt.

  • Clients can choose SMS login verification code in HotGo
  • Critical authentication bypass vulnerability rated 9.2
  • Upgrade or disable SMS login for privileged accounts

More from Friday 13 November →