Warren Buffett says really successful people say no to almost everything. Most leaders miss the point of his famous quote
Most leaders are pretty good at adding things. There’s always room for another initiative, another “important” meeting , or some new process or tech that’s supposed to make everyone’s life easier. Before long, the organization is carrying far more than anyone intended, and very little ever gets taken off the table. Sound familiar? Leaders aren’t nearly as good at subtraction. That’s why one of…
Most leaders excel at adding new initiatives, meetings and processes, causing their organizations to accumulate more than initially planned, with little being removed. This is in contrast to really successful individuals who say "no" to nearly everything. Warren Buffett famously observed that the key difference between successful people and really successful people is their ability to say no to almost all requests.
While this concept is often discussed in the context of time management and focusing on what truly matters, there is another crucial leadership lesson hidden within it. Every "yes" carries a cost that extends beyond the executive level. It filters down to employees who must attend additional meetings, create new presentations, monitor metrics, and find time to accommodate the new priority alongside existing tasks.
This results in organizations with multiple "top priorities," a corporate term for having no priorities at all. Saying "no" is fundamentally an allocation decision, a strategic choice of what not to do. Research indicates that companies struggle to terminate projects even after they lose relevance, leading to additional initiatives and increased workload.
The issue persists even when organizations recognize they have too many projects, causing execution to slow and strategic priorities to become muddled. As a leader, it is essential to give employees permission to discontinue tasks instead of merely accepting that they will figure it out. This approach becomes even more critical when resources are limited.
Studies show that when workload continues to increase while resources remain constant, leaders cannot continuously ask individuals to accomplish more with less. At some point, something must be removed from the table. The better question isn't always, "How can we get more done?" but rather, "Why are we still doing this?" Saying "no" becomes increasingly challenging as leaders attain greater success because more individuals seek their attention.
Customers, employees, investors, and partners believe they deserve continuous engagement. However, a CEO who cannot disappoint anyone will eventually disappoint everyone due to the organization becoming overextended and unable to execute its best ideas effectively. Warren Buffett's wisdom is not about constantly saying "no" all the time, but rather about clearly identifying what truly matters, making it easier to decline everything else. At times, the most strategic response a leader can provide is a simple two-letter word: "No."
Written by urgent.news from Fast Company's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.