Rubio says Trump’s war against Iran not ‘necessarily popular’ but needed to stop a nuclear threat

Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended President Donald Trump's decision to launch a war against Iran, despite the fact that it was not "necessarily popular." The war was aimed at safeguarding the world from Iran's nuclear ambitions, a threat Rubio stated Trump had identified. The conflict has contributed to higher energy prices due to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, where one-fifth of the world's oil passes.

Rubio, however, acknowledged the unpopularity of the war and its impact on the economy, attributing these factors to Democrats' victory in the recent elections.

Vice President Mike Pence's social media post largely blamed the war for the Republican losses in the midterm elections. In response, Rubio told reporters that Trump had taken action to stop Iran from pursuing nuclear weapons, even though doing so often resulted in unpopular decisions for the country. Rubio further stated that while Trump's approach was necessary, diplomatic efforts were not yielding significant results due to Iran's unreasonable demands.

The Trump administration continues to face criticism for the war's impact on the economy, particularly the higher energy prices resulting from the conflict. Trump reiterated his support for the war, stating that it would be considered one of the best things done in history if Iran had acquired a nuclear weapon. Trump is scheduled to meet with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani on Monday, with both parties reportedly reviewing proposals aimed at resolving their differences over Tehran's nuclear program.

However, Iran remains unwilling to negotiate without significant concessions, including the end of the U.S. blockade, lifting sanctions, unfreezing assets, and compensating for war damage, among other conditions.