Hong Kong must show real remorse for the Tai Po fire tragedy

On October 29, Hong Kong's Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu and seven top officials bowed deeply, marking a rare collective government apology for the devastating Wang Fuk Court fire that claimed 168 lives and displaced 1,984 households. While reforms have been promised, public reaction remains divided over the sincerity and effectiveness of the apology.

A political apology should acknowledge failure, accept responsibility, and commit to preventing recurrence. It aims to bring closure, but the government is yet to achieve this judgment. The timing of the apology has been questioned, as critics argue it was delayed, diminishing its impact. However, there was a valid reason for waiting – the government awaited the findings of an independent inquiry committee before issuing the apology.

An earlier apology could have provided comfort and acknowledged system failures. The government acknowledged faults in four departments related to supervisory duties, and is committed to reforms such as regulating scaffolding materials, updating fire safety installation rules, and criminalising bid-rigging. The apology marks the beginning of accountability, but sustained reform must follow.

The resignation of only one minister has raised questions about political responsibility, with differing views on what constitutes personal culpability. While some see one minister bearing responsibility, others argue that resignation should be tied to personal fault. Both perspectives deserve consideration, as the government's actions will be judged on whether they lead to lasting change in government operations.