Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

Trump's "war-time consigliere" and the Miller Doctrine

Stephen Miller is no Susie Wiles: He believes in almost limitless presidential power, considers the Democratic Party an extremist organization, and dreams of ruthless crackdowns on immigration and foreign adversaries. Why it matters: Miller, the new White House chief of staff, isn't just unlike anyone who's had the job under Trump — he's unlike any to occupy the powerful position in the modern…

Trump's "war-time consigliere" and the Miller Doctrine

Stephen Miller, the White House chief of staff, is known for his strong belief in expansive presidential authority and his perception of the Democratic Party as a harmful extremist organization. As Trump's new chief of staff, Miller's appointment marks a departure from previous administrations and positions him as a formidable figure in the current political landscape.

He is determined to implement a hardline approach, particularly in immigration and foreign policy, which could lead to a tense stand-off with the new Democratic-led Congress. The White House chief of staff's appointment signals that Trump is not interested in bipartisan cooperation, but rather in preparing for a confrontation, viewing Miller as a tactically adept individual who is seemingly untouchable by traditional restraints.

Miller's philosophy, known as the "Miller Doctrine," posits that presidential power is vast and unchallengeable, and that criticism is unwarranted. He has criticized the court system and labeled the Democratic Party as a domestic extremist group. He has also advocated for a hardline stance on immigration, comparing illegal immigration to terrorist organizations.

Miller's influence extends to Latin America policy, where he has been involved in actions against Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro. His appointment is seen as a strategy to reinvigorate Trump's populist base, which was hurt in the recent midterms. However, critics are apprehensive about Miller's potential to exacerbate division and alienate independent and moderate voters.

Written by urgent.news from Axios's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at axios.com →

More in World

US Midterms: What Is the Global Impact?

Media commentators across Europe and the Middle East have analyzed the strategic implications of the Democratic Party’s victory in the US midterm elections: what is known about the potential…

More from Saturday 7 November →