The Model Mix Is Growing, and Moving In-House
Developers are spreading their work across more models from more labs, and more of that work is running on models teams host themselves. Data published this week from OpenRouter, our own usage dashboard, and a talk by Revolut's AI ops lead all point the same way. The single-model setup is fading, and the default model is increasingly one you can run on your own hardware. Teams now run a portfolio…
Developers are increasingly using multiple models from various labs, with a growing number running on self-hosted models, according to data from OpenRouter, the company's usage dashboard, and a presentation by Revolut's AI operations leader. The trend of using a single model is waning, and the default model is now one that teams can run on their own hardware.
Customers spending over $100 a month now use an average of 6 model families, a two-fold increase from the previous year. The top 10% of customers have expanded their usage from 7 model families to 14. The usage distribution varies with spending levels: $100-$1K a month users use 5 labs, $1K-$10K users use 8 labs, and those spending over $10K use 12 labs.
Over 90% of the $10K+ group uses five or more labs. Loyalty to a single lab is rare, with fewer than 4% of major labs' users on OpenRouter using just one lab, even Anthropic, which is considered the most loyal, only has 39% of its customers' spend. The diversity in model usage is apparent within Kilo, with each agent role having its preferred model.
No single model dominates more than 30% of any role. Nvidia's Nemotron models are favored for code, plan, and debug, while review tasks see a mix of Claude Opus and GPT models. Developers use cheaper models for writing and debugging code, then switch to stronger models for error-checking. Some companies, like Revolut, are now serving self-hosted open models as the default coding model for a significant portion of their workforce.
Revolut's switch to self-hosted GLM 5.3 as the default coding model for about 2,000 engineers resulted in a 70% improvement in lead time and a 60% improvement in coding time, leading to better overall efficiency. The trend suggests a future where cheaper models handle routine tasks, while frontier models are reserved for critical steps where they provide the most value, and local AI proves effective at enterprise scale.
Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.