Maraga: What we see as opposition disunity is part of our democratic process

Former Chief Justice David Maraga has attempted to minimize concerns over discord within Kenya’s opposition, asserting that disagreements among leaders are inherent to the democratic framework rather than proof of abandonment of shared political aims. In a recent post on X, dated November 5, 2026, Maraga stated that opposition leaders remain committed to the overarching goals of challenging President William Ruto’s administration, alleviating economic hardships, and reinstating constitutional order, despite divergent views on how to accomplish these aims.

"What we see as opposition disunity is part of our democratic process," Maraga commented. He emphasized that these differences should not eclipse the common goal, stating, "We have the common objective of removing Ruto, lowering the cost of living, and reestablishing the country under constitutional order. Our disagreements pertain to the methods of achieving this objective."

Maraga’s comments stem from the recent public disputes among opposition personalities, which have given the impression of a political faction grappling to maintain a unified direction as the 2027 General Election looms. These disagreements have encompassed issues of leadership, political tactics, and the roles of various figures within a potential opposition coalition.

Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has also faced criticism from certain segments of the political opposition, with some describing his aggressive political manner as bullying, further fueling discussions about the opposition's ability to coexist with varying personalities and approaches. Maraga, however, portrayed the differences as disagreements over tactics rather than the ultimate political objective.

"We must concentrate on this objective. This is what the Kenyan people expect from us," he remarked. The former Chief Justice’s intervention underscores a distinction between having a shared political objective and consensus on the strategy, leadership, and arrangements required to pursue it. Although opposition leaders may concur on matters such as the cost of living and constitutional governance, their public disagreements can complicate the task of identifying a cohesive alternative for supporters.

Maraga’s message thus places the responsibility on opposition figures to ensure their differences do not overshadow the issues they claim to seek to address. The question of whether this shared agenda can be translated into a coordinated political strategy remains a key issue as the 2027 election approaches.