Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Russian hacktivists say they were behind freezer hacks, but speculation remains

Noname and Z-Pentest Alliance are claiming responsibility - but this is being met with scepticism.

Russian hacktivists say they were behind freezer hacks, but speculation remains

Two Russian hacktivist groups, Noname057(16) and Z-Pentest Alliance, have claimed responsibility for the recent wave of freezer hacks affecting European supermarkets. However, their Telegram posts and channels have since been deleted, leaving their claims open to skepticism. Cyber-security researchers are analyzing evidence from honeypots to uncover the identity of the attackers.

While Russian groups are not being ruled out, other possibilities include Iranian hacktivists, nation-state hackers, or even teenagers carrying out the hacks for entertainment. Three separate cyber-security firms deployed fake freezer software traps, known as honeypots, to monitor hacker tactics. The second wave of attacks was highly targeted, suggesting planning and coordination.

The entry point into the freezer software products was easily exploitable due to poor protection. The hackers had to gather public IP addresses of the affected devices, plan their methods, and execute them at the right time. Analysts noted that the hackers increased the temperature of the freezers overnight for maximum damage. Other firms, such as Lupovis and Sequoia, also observed pre-attack activity, but some suggest the scanning could have been automatic and not malicious.

While the attacks align with patterns seen in Russian hacktivist or government actions, investigations are ongoing to confirm the identity of the perpetrators. Authorities in several countries are actively investigating the hacks and warning supermarkets about potential future attacks.

Written by urgent.news from BBC Technology's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at bbc.co.uk →

More in Tech

StateBench’s matched traces make a better reading test

At one point in my generated StateBench example, g holds 99 and c holds 57. Three versions of the next update all leave g at 57: g <- c; g <- (g + 58) mod 100; g <- 57; The answer agrees.

  • StateBench introduces matched traces for clearer reading tests
  • Four program types: periodic, solvable, aperiodic, r-trivial
  • Matched traces reveal language model's state update understanding

More from Wednesday 4 November →