Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

Apple Will Check Public iCloud Links for Harmful Content Starting in iOS 27.3

Apple says it will start checking public iCloud links for harmful content in iOS 27.3, iPadOS 27.3, macOS 27.3, and visionOS 27.3. Images in iCloud Photos and files in iCloud Drive shared using the "Anyone with the link" option will be "made accessible to Apple" for a content check. Apple doesn't define harmful content, but it could mean malware, malicious files, and/or child sexual abuse…

Apple Will Check Public iCloud Links for Harmful Content Starting in iOS 27.3

Apple has announced that it will begin scanning public iCloud links for potentially harmful content in the upcoming iOS 27.3, iPadOS 27.3, macOS 27.3, and visionOS 27.3 operating system updates. Files in iCloud Photos and those shared through the "Anyone with the link" option in iCloud Drive will be accessible to Apple for review.

While Apple has not provided a specific definition of what constitutes harmful content, it could involve malware, malicious files, or child sexual abuse material (CSAM), considering Apple's mention of law enforcement cooperation. Attempting to upload harmful content may result in Apple removing, refusing, modifying, or deleting the content and potentially taking action against the user's Apple Account.

Options for sharing iCloud files include "Send a Copy," which directly transmits a file, or "Share a Link," allowing someone to download the file. The latter option, "Anyone with the link," is the one subject to Apple's content checks. It remains unclear whether links created before the 27.3 update will undergo review. The software containing these changes is currently available to developers for beta testing and will be released to the public in December.

Written by urgent.news from MacRumors's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 3 other outlets

Read the original at macrumors.com →

More in Tech

My app passed 1,100 tests. Six minutes on a real phone found five bugs.

I'm building a budgeting app called Budget Lover. It is a personal project, written in Flutter with Firebase behind it, and it tries to answer one question: how much can I spend today?

  • App tested on real phone for six minutes
  • Five bugs discovered despite 1,100+ automated tests
  • New tests added to address each identified bug

Co-Packaged Optics vs Pluggable 1.6T: Who Pays When the Laser Dies

The switch industry has spent a decade promising that optics would move onto the package. In 2026 it is finally happening, in volume, at 51.2 terabits per second per chassis.

  • Co-packaged optics shift packaging approach in industry.
  • Pluggable optics replace easily, consume 12-15W for 800G.
  • Co-packaged optics have higher system-level savings but costly failure.

High-NA EUV vs Multi-Patterning: The 2nm Decision Nobody Wants to Price

Every leading-edge fab that plans to ship a 2nm-class node in the next three years is having the same argument behind closed doors. The question is not whether High-NA EUV works.

  • High-NA EUV scanners enable 8nm features, compared to 13nm for low-NA systems
  • High-NA scanners cost $350-$400M upfront, higher than low-NA systems
  • Fewer patterning passes in High-NA EUV reduce cycle time and working capital costs

More from Wednesday 4 November →