Rights groups question need for curbs on Rohingya

Malaysian human rights groups have raised concerns over a proposed restriction on Rohingya refugees' movement, questioning the evidence supporting such measures. The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam), led by chairman Hishamudin Yunus, stated that any restrictions must be evidence-based, proportionate, and aligned with Malaysia's constitutional and human rights obligations.

Yunus emphasized that there is no credible evidence suggesting that Rohingya refugees as a group pose a threat to Malaysia's national security or sovereignty. Police Inspector-General Khalid Ismail, in June, reported that Rohingya accounted for just 0.02% of the country's overall crime rate from 2024 to that date, adding that Khalid discouraged negative stereotypes and speculation regarding the community.

Suhakam also highlighted that strict movement controls could hinder refugees' access to essential services, family connections, and legal assistance, potentially leading to forced labor and exploitation. Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi confirmed that the government is examining the possibility of limiting Rohingya movement, considering security, national sovereignty, and human rights factors.

Hishamudin stressed that any such restrictions must be fair, non-discriminatory, and not contravene refugees' rights to life, personal liberty, protection from forced labor, and freedom of religion, as guaranteed under Malaysia's Federal Constitution. Tenaganita executive director Glorene Das echoed the concerns, arguing that there is no evidence linking restricting movement to addressing national security threats.

She urged the government to substantiate the claimed threat, explain its necessity, and ensure accountability before implementing such measures. Das called for a focus on enforcing existing laws fairly and effectively to tackle criminal activities and maintain public order, rather than resorting to measures based on fear or isolated incidents.