Republicans set to take a hit in US midterms
Republicans set to take a hit in US midterms newspress_en Mon, 11/02/2026 - 07:45 Politics Republican anxiety is rising ahead of the US midterm election. Tradition dictates that the party occupying the White House generally loses seats in one or both chambers of Congress midway through its executive tenure. Sometimes these lost seats end up costing the party overall control of the legislature.…
Republicans anticipate losses in the upcoming US midterm elections. Political analysts warn that the party in power typically suffers setbacks in mid-term elections, as voters often express dissatisfaction with the president's decisions and turn to opposition parties. However, there are exceptions to this trend, such as in 1998 and 2002 when Democratic and Republican presidents, respectively, saw increases in their party's congressional seats due to favorable economic conditions and support for their policies.
US President Donald Trump's concerns about potential losses are evident in his repeated calls for his supporters to vote. Recent polls indicate a close race, with 47% of registered voters favoring the Democratic Party and 35% supporting the Republicans. The outcome of the elections, which will determine control of the House of Representatives, is uncertain, as 435 seats are up for grabs nationwide.
Currently, Republicans hold a narrow majority with 218 seats to Democrats' 214, and one independent and two vacancies leave the balance uncertain.
A recent survey suggests that Democrats may gain between 12 and 22 seats, potentially giving them a majority. However, securing control of the Senate remains a significant challenge for Democrats. With 35 seats contested, Democrats must defend all 47 seats they hold, along with gaining at least four additional seats. This would require Republicans to hold their current 33 seats and pick up four more.
Control of both chambers of Congress would empower Democrats to block legislation, conduct oversight, and launch investigations, but they still would not have the ability to veto presidential appointments requiring Senate confirmation.
Written by urgent.news from Al Majalla English's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.