Pass the framework, test the restrictions
For Korean policymakers, the U.S. Senate’s failure on Sept. 15 to advance the proposed CLARITY Act, which would establish a federal regulatory framework for digital assets and clarify the respective roles of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), deserves attention. The immediate setback was American, but the legislative risk is…
For Korean policymakers, the U.S. Senate's inability to pass the CLARITY Act on September 15 is a matter to consider. The immediate obstacle was American, but the legislative uncertainty is a common challenge in Seoul. The bill failed to gather the necessary 60 votes after years of industry calls. The House had previously approved a version, and senators had been working to revise it for months.
With the upcoming midterm elections, the bill's fate remains uncertain, leading to regulatory ambiguity. In the absence of legislation, companies rely on SEC and CFTC interpretations, which could change under future administrations or legal challenges. For Korea, a key lesson is the importance of a comprehensive digital asset law.
Such legislation provides businesses with a more stable foundation for hiring, investment, and product development. The bill's strength resided in its wide-ranging scope, encompassing token classification and outlining the roles of the SEC and CFTC.
Written by urgent.news from The Korea Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Pass the framework, test the restrictions koreatimes.co.kr
