Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

With AI to talk to, are children talking less to their parents?

With AI to talk to, are children talking less to their parents?

The Indian Express reports on a growing concern that children are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence (AI) for emotional support and conversation, potentially at the expense of talking to their parents. With AI offering immediate, judgment-free responses, children may find it easier to express themselves, share worries, and ask questions without fear of criticism or unwanted advice.

However, this shift raises questions about the role of parents as trusted emotional guides and whether children are relying too heavily on technology for emotional support. While AI can be a helpful tool for learning and exploring ideas, it cannot replace the nuanced understanding and guidance that comes from human relationships.

The article emphasizes the importance of parents listening attentively, offering empathy, and avoiding the immediate need to provide solutions, allowing children to feel comfortable sharing their thoughts and feelings.

Brief written by urgent.news from The Indian Express's own syndicated text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at indianexpress.com →

More in AI

Multi-Turn Jailbreaks Against AI Agents With Tool Access

Originally published on robatdasorvi.com The defense against a multi-turn jailbreak on an AI agent is to stop the tool call, not the conversation.

  • Multi-turn jailbreaks bypass AI guardrails by spreading attacks over several turns.
  • Refusal occurs within model, while tool call happens outside model's scope.
  • Prevent by enforcing permission check in code at tool boundary, outside model's influence.

Are LLMs good or bad Bayesians?

Bryan Caplan: It seems like you and other AIs are bad Bayesians. When presented with counterevidence, you should move toward or against the presenter with roughly equal probability.

  • Caplan argues LLMs exhibit poor Bayesian reasoning.
  • ChatGPT either adjusts position or fails to change with counterarguments.
  • Updates should occur under suitable calibration assumptions, Caplan claims.

More from Sunday 1 November →