Are you over-optimizing your hobbies?
We often pick up hobbies to add some fun to our lives. We join a book group, take up knitting, or commit to finally learning how to play pickleball. But before long, what started out as leisure can begin to feel like just another obligation to execute and perfect: We fall behind in the reading, […]
Pursuing hobbies often begins as a means of adding enjoyment to our lives, whether through joining a book club, knitting, or learning a new sport like pickleball. However, as time goes on, what started as leisure can turn into an obligation, making us feel trapped in a cycle of perfectionism. This narrative is not unique to modern times, but rather a reflection of a long-standing attitude towards productivity ingrained in American culture.
Historian Gary Cross points out that this mindset, rooted in the Protestant work ethic, has been a part of the nation's history since the early days of migration. As industrialization progressed, the emphasis on productivity intensified, with leisure time increasingly perceived as wasted time. Even when workers were granted free time for hobbies in the early 20th century, the same mentality persisted.
Journalist and author Jenny Odell has delved into this subject in her books, Saving Time and How to Do Nothing, highlighting the pain and exhaustion that can come from an intense and relentless focus on time. To break free from this cycle, Odell suggests embracing a more playful and experimental mindset when approaching hobbies.
One way to do this is by adopting the practice of taking values on and off, as demonstrated in games, where players can easily switch between different sets of values. Reflecting on the role of failure in hobbies, Odell emphasizes its importance and undervaluation. She believes that failure can be a powerful learning tool, allowing us to reassess our perspectives and challenge the seductive allure of quantification and optimization.
Written by urgent.news from Vox's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
