Backdoors in official Claude Code extensions
In the world of coding, artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to help developers write code more efficiently in the terminal. A recent article sought to compare popular AI coding tools, such as OpenCode, Codex, and Claude Code, to determine which one provides the best user experience.
The author has been using OpenCode with free models and has had a positive experience, reporting that it is responsive and has worked without issues. They are now interested in comparing OpenCode with Codex and Claude Code.
The article encourages readers who use AI coding tools in the terminal to share their experiences. They are particularly interested in which tool individuals use, whether they have tried free or paid models, and what kinds of coding tasks the tools are used for.
Additionally, readers are asked to share how many back-and-forth interactions are typically needed to achieve good results with each tool. The article also asks for feedback on which aspects of each tool work particularly well or poorly.
The author is especially interested in real-world comparisons, looking for the tool that gets the job done with the least amount of friction. They invite readers to share their setup or specific examples, offering insights into what is working for them.
By gathering firsthand accounts and detailed comparisons, the article aims to help developers make an informed decision on which AI coding tool to try next.
Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Claude Code is the best Linux tech support I've ever had xda-developers.com
- OpenCode vs. Codex vs. Claude Code: What Are You Using in the Terminal? dev.to
- Backdoors in Claude Code for VS, Cursor official extensions cyberplace.social
- Cursor says up to 5,000 users affected by tampered Claude Code extension channelnewsasia.com
