I tried 3 privacy-focused Google Maps alternatives, and giving up Google was harder than I expected

When one hears the term AI, it is often associated with ChatGPT. Although it may not be the go-to AI tool for everyone, it has become the face of artificial intelligence. Google Maps is in a similar position, as it is often the first app that comes to mind when discussing maps or navigation. This app is deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem and offers more than just getting from point A to point B. However, just because something is the norm does not necessarily mean it is the best choice for everyone, especially when considering privacy.

To explore this, I tested three privacy-focused Google Maps alternatives: Organic Maps, OsmAnd, and HERE WeGo. Two of these apps, Organic Maps and OsmAnd, are open-source and prioritize user privacy. They utilize OpenStreetMap data, support offline navigation, and do not rely on Google services for navigation. Users can download maps in advance, search for places, plan routes, and receive turn-by-turn directions without needing an internet connection.

Moreover, neither app tracks users' movements to function. Organic Maps offers a straightforward experience, while OsmAnd provides more customization options such as map layer adjustments, route fine-tuning, and personalized navigation. On the other hand, HERE WeGo takes a different approach by offering real-time traffic information, public transit directions, and a more conventional navigation experience.

While it may not be as privacy-focused as the other two, it offers several features familiar to Google Maps users. Google Maps excels in many areas, but its offline navigation falls short. There is no walking or cycling directions offline, and features like live traffic information and alternative routes are unavailable. This was evident when I was in Berlin for IFA recently, needing to get a local SIM card.

With limited time and unfamiliar surroundings, relying on offline maps on Google Maps proved challenging. I had to download them beforehand, which was not an ideal situation. Offline navigation was one of the primary factors I tested with Organic Maps, OsmAnd, and HERE WeGo. In my home country, navigating places I was already familiar with, I downloaded the necessary maps, turned off mobile data, and attempted to navigate using these apps.

Compared to Google Maps, the first app lacked built-in real-time traffic data, while OsmAnd offered extensive customization options. HERE WeGo provided real-time traffic information but was not as accurate or reliable as Google Maps. Google's real-time traffic data relies on user-collected data about speed, combined with historical traffic patterns and machine learning to predict congestion.

This gives Google Maps an edge in estimating arrival times and suggesting alternative routes. While these three apps allowed me to navigate offline, Organic Maps and OsmAnd lacked built-in real-time traffic data, whereas HERE WeGo's accuracy was inferior to Google Maps. Despite the differences, Google Maps remains superior in various aspects, including real-time traffic information.