Let Yosemite Burn
Firefighters are dying trying to put out fires that could be left alone.
Federal authorities have unleashed a massive firefighting effort against the Dome Fire in Yosemite National Park. This year, the administration has instructed firefighters to aggressively suppress every wildfire, aiming for "full suppression" to prevent dangerous spread. With at least 17 helicopters in the air and more than 1,000 firefighters on the ground, the park has been inundated with resources.
Park officials and former fire experts have expressed concern over the scale of the response, questioning whether putting out this particular fire is necessary. The aggressive tactics have already led to one helicopter crash, resulting in the deaths of both pilots. The policy of full fire suppression, which emphasizes rapid suppression, has led to a concerning increase in entrapments—a situation where firefighters are surrounded by flames.
This year, at least 17 wildland firefighters, pilots, and contractors have been killed, surpassing the average over the past decade. Critics argue that such an aggressive approach may have been unnecessary, especially given that the fire was not threatening any communities or homes. The policy debate has roots in Yosemite's history, where Native Americans intentionally set fires to manage the landscape for centuries.
After a lightning-caused fire was allowed to burn in 1974, biologists documented a resurgence of biodiversity in the Illilouette Creek basin.
Written by urgent.news from The Atlantic's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
