Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

The AI promise was automation. The reality? Managing digital workers

When artificial intelligence agents first arrived, they came with a tantalising promise: autonomous “digital workers” that would finally free humans from corporate drudgery. As businesses across Asia are discovering, however, the reality is quite the opposite – more work, new friction and a whole new layer of management. When Xiao Mengjie, an AI product marketing manager at a Big Tech firm in…

The AI promise was automation. The reality? Managing digital workers

When artificial intelligence agents first emerged, they promised to automate mundane corporate tasks, freeing humans from tedious work. However, businesses in Asia are discovering that the reality is quite different – AI agents are creating more work, new friction, and requiring additional management layers. Xiao Mengjie, an AI product marketing manager in Shanghai, assigned two AI agents to a simple task, expecting efficiency.

Instead, she encountered corporate gridlock, as her agent and her supervisor's agent argued over responsibilities, creating a bureaucratic situation similar to the one they were meant to replace. This communication overhead is a common issue across Asia, where businesses have embraced the idea of autonomous software capable of handling complex workflows with minimal human intervention.

Meta's personal agent Muse and OpenClaw, a Chinese open-source agent, have seen massive adoption, but many businesses are facing challenges in managing these digital workers effectively. Deploying AI agents in complex environments, such as hotel operations or travel industry workflows, often proves more difficult than anticipated.

The agents struggle to navigate fragmented systems, determine when human intervention is necessary, and coordinate across multiple departments. Additionally, legacy technology systems and organizational resistance in countries like Hong Kong slow down AI adoption, particularly in sectors like banking and insurance where data security concerns are paramount.

Despite these hurdles, the demand for AI agents continues to grow, but organizations must address the underlying governance challenges to ensure these autonomous systems remain accountable and aligned with human objectives.

Written by urgent.news from SCMP Tech's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at scmp.com →

More in AI

Five AI Agents After the Code: What GitLab Duo Did in a Real Pipeline

Quick answer: I put five GitLab Duo agents (plan, review, fix, secure, release) around a small Python service and let them work after the code was written.

  • Five AI agents specialized in plan, review, fix, secure, and release
  • Agents completed tasks faster than human counterparts
  • Agents reduced container scan findings from 166 to 1

Debugging LLM JSON Output: From Frustration to Function Calling

Alright, fellow builders. Let me tell you about a particular rabbit hole I found myself tumbling down for a good couple of weeks.

  • Developer struggled with unpredictable JSON output from language models.
  • Language models like GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4-turbo generated faulty JSON for complex prompts.
  • Switching to function calling eliminated raw JSON and syntax errors.

DeepSeek swapped its Flash model overnight. I pulled the new config and did the cache math.

On October 17, DeepSeek replaced the model behind its deepseek-flash API endpoint. Same name, same price, no changelog entry you had to go read — if your agent called deepseek-flash on Friday and…

  • DeepSeek replaced its Flash model with DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on October 17
  • KV cache compression varies from 688 to 5.4 bytes per token depending on context length
  • API pricing shows cached input tokens are 50 times cheaper than uncached

More from Sunday 18 October →