A Hall of Fame of Real Stats
Real figures from the TDK CLI GitHub repository as of October 18, 2026: stars, forks, releases, merged pull requests, open and closed issues, and contributors. What the numbers show, and what they don't. Most project posts quote numbers without saying where they came from. These are read directly from the tdk-cli-core repository on GitHub on October 18, 2026, using the GitHub CLI. They will have…
Statistical Snapshot of TDK CLI Repository
The TDK CLI GitHub repository, as of October 18, 2026, reveals a snapshot of its activity through various metrics. At a glance, the project has garnered 21 stars, 25 forks, 51 releases, and 857 merged pull requests. This indicates a consistent release cycle and a high rate of merged contributions. The repository has also seen 306 open issues, of which 171 are specifically labeled for Hacktoberfest, suggesting a community-driven approach to issue resolution.
Furthermore, there are 9 open pull requests and 338 closed issues, demonstrating a balanced backlog that is both active and manageable. The small community is represented by 29 contributors, 25 forks, and 21 stars. While these numbers might seem modest, they suggest a focused and engaged community rather than a broad, scattered user base.
However, it's important to note that the star and fork counts do not necessarily reflect the true adoption of TDK CLI in production environments. Similarly, the contributor count does not equate to the number of individuals whose work has been merged. For a more comprehensive understanding of the project's reach, one should refer to the project's adopters list and the "Hall of Fame" issue (#602), which separately tracks merged contributors.
In summary, the TDK CLI repository demonstrates an actively maintained project with frequent releases and an engaged contributor base. Despite its modest star and fork numbers, the project may still be a suitable fit for your team, and the best way to determine this is by trying it out firsthand.
Written by urgent.news from Dev.to's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.