The Defense ETF Duel: Old Guard Aerospace or Next-Gen Tech?
Key PointsInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF has a much larger assets under management (AUM) and a slightly lower expense ratio than First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF.
When comparing the Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and the First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL), investors face two distinct options within the same narrow sector. Both funds concentrate on defense-related companies, albeit with notable differences in cost, size, and historical performance.
The Invesco fund, an old-guard asset, boasts a larger portfolio, dating back to 2005, and has accrued $7.2 billion in assets under management. This fund offers a dividend yield of 0.4% and charges an expense ratio of 0.58%, slightly lower than its First Trust counterpart but still above the average ETF expense ratio.
Conversely, the First Trust fund is a more recent addition, launched in 2022, with $2.1 billion in assets under management. This fund presents a higher yield of 0.1% and carries a marginally higher expense ratio of 0.60%. However, MISL's portfolio is more concentrated and modern, with significant positions in innovative companies like Palantir and SpaceX.
Historically, PPA has outperformed MISL, generating a total return of 117% with a CAGR of 21.6% over the past decade, compared to MISL's 105% return and 19.8% CAGR. While neither fund provides substantial dividends, PPA's yield gives it a slight edge.
In terms of cost, both funds fall short of the average ETF expense ratio, with PPA at 0.58% and MISL at 0.60%. Despite these differences, PPA appears to be the more attractive choice for investors, offering superior performance, yield, and cost efficiency. However, for those seeking a forward-looking approach with exposure to cutting-edge tech companies, MISL may be the better option. Ultimately, the decision between these two ETFs hinges on one's investment priorities and risk tolerance.
Written by urgent.news from Motley Fool's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.