Researchers in exile thrive in new academic settings when they contribute knowledge, not just receive aid
Publishing scientific articles requires more than knowledge of academic writing conventions; it also depends on access to networks that support the research and publication process. Academic networks provide opportunities to exchange knowledge, receive feedback and develop collaborations that can strengthen both research and careers. For researchers in vulnerable situations, such connections can…
Research findings reveal that academic networks play a vital role in the success of researchers who have fled their home countries. These networks provide opportunities for collaboration, feedback and knowledge exchange, which can be crucial for researchers facing difficult circumstances. According to Baraa Khuder, a senior lecturer at Chalmers University of Technology and lead author of the study, networks can be a matter of survival for vulnerable researchers.
The study, titled "Academic Networking in Transition: Mapping Trajectories of Mobility and Precarity," was conducted by Khuder and Bojana Petric, a researcher from the University of London. It examines how Syrian researchers in exile build networks to support their efforts to publish their work in scholarly journals.
Khuder's key finding is that networks become stronger and more sustainable when researchers contribute their own expertise, data, feedback and professional contacts to the network. This shift from being passive recipients of aid to active collaborators, mentors or experts leads to more enduring relationships and sustainable outcomes.
The study shows that networks can lead to publications, conference presentations, research funding applications and even job opportunities. One researcher secured a postdoctoral position through their network. The connections may seem small at first, but over time, they can result in significant academic achievements.
Khuder emphasizes that universities and research funders should do more than just create networking opportunities. They should provide guidance to help researchers identify their goals, the contacts they need and the contributions they can make. Meetings and activities should be structured in a way that fosters ongoing collaboration.
While informal networking is valuable, the study suggests that more structured support is needed, especially for researchers in vulnerable situations. This support should create conditions for reciprocal and long-term collaboration.
Written by urgent.news from Phys.org's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
