Bombay HC Extends Year-Round Ban On Bursting Firecrackers On Public Roads, Streets And Footpaths
Mumbai, October 15, 2026: The Bombay High Court on Thursday extended its restrictions on bursting firecrackers on public roads, streets and footpaths to the entire year, directing the Maharashtra government and civic authorities to step up public awareness efforts to curb noise and air pollution during festivals. A bench of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale said its September 22 order,…
In a landmark decision on October 15, 2026, the Bombay High Court extended its year-round ban on bursting firecrackers on public roads, streets, and footpaths. The court emphasized the need for enhanced public awareness efforts to reduce noise and air pollution during festivals. Justices Girish Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale issued the directive, mandating the Maharashtra government, civic authorities, and stakeholders to strengthen awareness campaigns.
The court reiterated their September 22, 2026, order prohibiting firecracker bursting during festivals, extending the restriction to all festivals throughout the year. The court highlighted the harmful effects of firecrackers on health, particularly for children and senior citizens, urging authorities to enforce existing laws and increase public compliance.
The Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC) and Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) were directed to launch an awareness campaign within a week, involving schools, public announcements, and displays on buses, train stations, and other platforms. The campaign should promote the use of green crackers and lower emission firecrackers, adhering to specified bursting times.
A complaint mechanism, including phone numbers, email addresses, and app-based systems, was proposed for citizens to report violations. The court clarified that its restrictions did not apply to firecracker manufacture, sale, or general festive activities, focusing instead on activities already regulated by the court.
Written by urgent.news from Free Press Journal's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.