Putin Fights to Preserve Russia’s Fading Influence in Central Asia
Back in 1991, the formation of the Commonwealth of Independent States placed the final nail in the Soviet Union’s coffin. Since then, the CIS itself has proven mostly moribund, falling far short of fulfilling the aims outlined in its 1993 charter. The results of the recent CIS summit in Turkmenistan, marking the 35th anniversary of its formation, offered more of the same, featuring lots of empty…
In 1991, the Soviet Union dissolved, giving birth to the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). However, the CIS has largely failed to meet the objectives set forth in its 1993 charter. The 35th anniversary of the CIS summit in Turkmenistan this year, held at the Avaza resort on the Caspian Sea, saw Russian President Vladimir Putin as its most enthusiastic supporter.
Despite the organization's history of inactivity, Putin claimed that the CIS had advanced significantly, establishing itself as a key regional integration body. Economically, there is little reason to retain the CIS, but Putin sees it as a means to preserve Russia's cultural legacy in Central Asia and the South Caucasus. He highlighted the CIS's role in maintaining social, cultural, and humanitarian ties among former Soviet republics and emphasized the Russian language as a unifying force in the region.
However, English and local languages are gaining popularity among younger generations in major cities, while Russian's presence wanes outside urban centers. Central Asian governments are also reducing Russian's status through legal changes, and historical interpretations are shifting to view Soviet-era influence as oppressive rather than beneficial.
Despite the CIS's shortcomings, a document signed at the Avaza summit specifically aims to preserve historical memory, particularly the victory of Soviet peoples in World War II. This effort may help the Kremlin bolster Russia's cultural influence in Central Asia, even if the organization remains largely ineffective.
Written by urgent.news from OilPrice's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.