Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Finance & Markets

How bad has the ‘cost of living crisis’ really been?

The 'cost of living crisis' has become a well-worn phrase over the last four years, but what do the numbers actually say, asks Paul Ormerod.

How bad has the ‘cost of living crisis’ really been?

The phrase "cost of living crisis" has gained prominence over the past four years, but the actual impact on households is not as dire as it seems, according to Paul Ormerod. During the energy price and inflation shocks of 2022/23, the term experienced a surge in search volume on the internet but has since declined steadily. Politicians continue to reference the issue, with phrases like "cost of living," "living costs," and "financial strain" frequently appearing in their speeches.

Despite the challenges, average earnings have increased by 1.4% annually since mid-2023, a modest improvement compared to the stagnant growth of the 2010s when real earnings remained nearly stagnant. Households have managed to maintain a substantial savings rate of 9% of disposable income and have been actively repaying debt. The overall financial health of the household sector remains robust, with fewer households facing mortgage renewals than previously experienced during the pandemic.

However, the concerns lie beneath the surface. Mortgage payments for around 150,000 households are expected to rise in the coming years, and the government's cautious approach to public sector pay settlements has widened the pay gap between the private and public sectors. This gap has persisted, leading to a decline in real earnings growth in the private sector.

Even with the current inflation rate above 3%, the negative real earnings growth in the private sector indicates that the cost of living crisis may resurface this winter.

Written by urgent.news from City AM's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at cityam.com →

More in Finance & Markets

How to Detect Look-Ahead Bias in Your Own Backtest

Look-ahead bias is the failure where your backtest uses information that did not exist yet at the moment it made a decision.

  • Look-ahead bias uses future information during decision-making
  • Detect it by comparing backtest results with and without future data
  • Leaks appear consistent across all periods, often unnoticed

NEAR Protocol Trading Bot: What to Test First

Before you point a trading bot at NEAR Protocol or any other coin that is trending right now, test four things first: real trading costs at today's spreads, a large enough sample of trades, how the…

  • Evaluate real trading costs like spreads and fees
  • Ensure backtest includes substantial trade sample
  • Test bot performance on unseen data

More from Wednesday 14 October →